|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Sen. Hagel Introduces Bill To Extend Social Security
Retirement to 68
First
Social Security Bill of this Congress also supports private investment
accounts
March 7, 2005 – While President Bush prepares to
begin a two-month grassroots campaign to win support for the private
investment accounts in Social Security, a Republican Senator, Chuck
Hagel of Nebraska, will introduce a bill today calling for increasing
the Social Security retirement age from 67 to 68 in 2023. It is the
first Social Security bill to be introduced in this Congress.
"We are living longer," Hagel told Bob Scheiffer
yesterday on CBS' "Face the Nation." "So when you look at the total
universe of this, I think that makes some sense to extend the age."
|
Sen. Hagel's speech introducing the bill and details of his plan
follow the news story.
For transcript of what Sen. Hagel said on CBS's Face the Nation
-
Click Here
For Sen. Hagel's Website -
Click Here |
|
|
For all the news about Social
Security Reform - Click Here |
|
Hagel also supports adding the private investment
accounts, which has cost his plan the support of key Democrats. Sen. Ted
Kennedy said on ABC’s “This Week” yesterday this would be a “great
threat to seniors.”
“The Social Security system is not in crisis today,
but there is clearly a crisis on the horizon,” Hagel said in a speech
this morning to explain his bill. “In 2018, more money will be paid out
of Social Security than comes in. In 2042, the Social Security Trust
Fund will be insolvent. Beyond the next 75 years, there is only a black
hole of unfunded liability for future generations.”
“No American age 45 or older will see a change in
Social Security or their benefits,” he said. “For Americans under 45, my
bill would provide the option of voluntary personal accounts.”
Hagel said, “Providing personal accounts is good
policy for both the long-term viability of Social Security and for
individuals. Government should be about empowering individuals and
enhancing personal freedoms and their futures. Personal accounts help do
this.”
Sen. Hagle says his bill will make Social Security
solvent for future years because:
"First, my bill would raise the current full
benefit retirement age by one year – from 67 to 68.
"Second, my bill would maintain the current early
retirement age at 62, but would adjust benefits for those who choose to
retire early. Currently, workers who retire early receive 70% of their
full retirement benefits. My bill would provide these early retirees
with 63% of the traditional benefit.
"Third, currently, an individual’s base Social
Security benefit is determined by two factors: their average income over
35 years and the wage index. My bill adds a third component: life
expectancy. Over the life of the program, Social Security benefit
calculations have never been adjusted to reflect increased life
expectancy.
"By factoring increased life expectancy into the
base benefit calculation, the rate of increase in benefit payments will
be slowed. No other changes will be made to the annual Consumer Price
Indexing of benefit increases.
He said these adjustments will not only make Social
Security solvent, but "can help us confront the challenges of increasing
Medicare costs and shortages in the workforce. It is important to
protect the option of early retirement, but our laws need to encourage
individuals to stay in the work force, not leave it. Medicare costs,
Medicaid costs, and labor shortages can be significantly reduced by
keeping people healthy and productive and in the workforce."
"My bill pays for these changes in Social Security
by using the existing 3.7 trillion dollar unfunded liability to ensure
the long-term health of the Social Security system. Doing nothing will
mean that at the end of 75 years, Social Security will have chewed up
3.7 trillion tax payer dollars to keep Social Security solvent and we
will still have an insolvent program with trillions of dollars more of
unfunded liabilities staring us in the face. In recent testimony before
the Senate, Alan Greenspan said Social Security’s total unfunded
liability could be as high as 10 trillion dollars over the life of the
program," he added.
Complete Text
Speech by Sen. Chuck Hagel Detailing His Social
Security Reform Plan
March 7th, 2005 - University of Nebraska-Lincoln -
When I began my first campaign for the United States Senate in 1995, I
published a booklet entitled, "Where I Stand." I wrote it because the
first obligation of a candidate is to tell voters what you believe. In
that booklet, I wrote:
"The Social Security System must be preserved,
protected, and improved. We have made this covenant with our senior
citizens. However, the long-term future of the Social Security system is
in peril. If we do not get this issue resolved soon, this nation faces
an entitlement disaster, eroding the trust between grandchildren and
grandparents. We must explore every option in order to fix and
strengthen our Social Security system. This will require bold
leadership."
A decade later, those words still define my
position on Social Security.
Social Security has been one of the most important
and successful government programs in the history of America. Almost
every American family over the last seventy years has been touched by
Social Security.
In signing The Social Security Act of 1935,
Franklin Roosevelt said, "None of the sums of money paid out to
individuals in assistance or insurance will spell anything approaching
abundance. But they will furnish that minimum necessity to keep a
foothold; and that is the kind of protection Americans want."
A fundamental point that President Roosevelt made
was that Social Security was not intended to replace the personal
responsibility of individuals saving for and preparing for their own
retirements. Social Security was never intended to be a substitute for a
retirement or savings plan. It is a safety net for people. Social
Security is an insurance contract that protects the most vulnerable in
our society from falling into poverty. But Social Security is
actuarially unsustainable with its present commitments to future
generations.
This afternoon, I will introduce a comprehensive
Social Security reform bill in the United States Senate. But I wanted to
start the day here in Nebraska with some of the people who would be most
affected by my bill......America’s next generation. It is your
generation that will be asked to sustain the future of Social Security.
Obligation to fix the problem
My generation, the "baby boom" generation, has been
the largest and most productive workforce in the history of man. The
impending retirement of the 77 million strong "baby boom" generation
will impact every aspect of our economy, government, and society:
Medicare and Medicaid; health care; our workforce; and our competitive
position in a world filled with countries much younger than ours.
The next generation of Americans will respond to
these challenges as every generation has responded to its challenges:
with innovation and hard work. However, my generation has a moral
obligation to ensure that future generations do not have to bear an
increasingly heavy burden of providing the retirement resources for
future generations. That is why we must reform Social Security. It is a
1935 model trying to operate in a 21st century world. It will soon be
incapable of delivering the promises and resources that it was built to
provide.
Last week, in testimony before the House Budget
Committee, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan urged Congress to act
on modernizing entitlement programs "sooner rather than later." He
warned that unless we act now, meeting the huge unfunded liabilities
facing our entitlement programs, there will be "severe" economic
consequences for our nation. Chairman Greenspan is right.
The Problem
America’s largest entitlement programs, Social
Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, are on a trajectory that cannot be
sustained. For Fiscal Year 2006, the Congressional Budget Office tells
us that 64 percent of the 2.5 trillion dollar budget will be obligated
to mandatory spending, of which 42 percent is for these three programs.
Those are tax dollars that are committed; money that cannot be used for
anything else. Each year the percentage of the budget obligated to
funding entitlement programs grows larger and larger. The current
unfunded liability for Social Security over the 75-year horizon the
Social Security Administration uses to calculate benefits and
expenditures is 3.7 trillion dollars. Medicare’s unfunded liability is
nearly 28 trillion dollars. This is in addition to America’s current
national debt of 7.5 trillion dollars.
Medicare costs are growing faster than any other
government or entitlement program. As we see health care costs continue
to rise, coupled with the growing number of retirees, it will only
continue to put more and more pressure on our federal budget and squeeze
out money for important discretionary government programs like
education, roads, parks, and housing programs. Last Congress, we passed
an enormous expansion of Medicare. I voted against it. I thought it was
bad policy and would add hundreds of billions of dollars to an already
unsustainable program. I am supportive of efforts to re-open the
Medicare Reform Bill and fix it. But, for political reasons, I doubt
that will happen soon, although we will be forced to deal with it in the
future.
The Social Security system is not in crisis today,
but there is clearly a crisis on the horizon. In 2018, more money will
be paid out of Social Security than comes in. In 2042, the Social
Security Trust Fund will be insolvent. Beyond the next 75 years, there
is only a black hole of unfunded liability for future generations. The
longer we do nothing, the more difficult it will be to protect Social
Security and the promise our government made to future generations of
Americans. This reality is daunting, but there is good news in all of
this. The system can be fixed. It is within our power to preserve the
social safety net of this nation. It has been done before. In 1983,
President Reagan worked with Congressional Democrats and Republicans to
make tough choices and extend the life of Social Security.
Dealing with this problem now means facing less
dramatic and difficult choices down the road. The earlier we confront
the reality of the coming crisis, the more options we will have to come
up with a wise and sustainable course of action.
Principles of the Bill
Allow me to now lay out the main points of my
Social Security Reform Bill.
-
My bill would ensure the vitality of Social Security for future
generations.
-
There are no easy choices to fix the
demographic challenges facing Social Security. Understanding this,
we must make choices that address the problem responsibly and
fairly.
-
My bill would make changes to Social Security
only for those Americans under the age of 45.
-
No American age 45 or older will see a change
in Social Security or their benefits.
-
For Americans under 45, my bill would provide
the option of voluntary personal accounts.
-
Providing personal accounts is good policy for
both the long-term viability of Social Security and for individuals.
Government should be about empowering individuals and enhancing
personal freedoms and their futures. Personal accounts help do this.
-
For those under 45, my bill would continue to
provide a guaranteed Social Security benefit from the Social
Security Trust Fund.
-
Under any reform plan, Americans still need the
security of knowing that the portion of their Social Security
benefits that come from the traditional Social Security system will
be guaranteed.
-
My bill would continue to guarantee survivor
and disability benefits as they currently are.
-
Social Security provides benefits for more than
six million spouses and children of breadwinners who died
prematurely or became disabled. For these families, their benefits
should not be touched. I know something about this. When I was 16
years-old, my father died. The Social Security benefits my mother
received were critical in helping her raise four young boys.
-
I well remember my mother’s relief when that
Social Security check arrived each month. We must remember that the
first obligation of Social Security is to the most needy Americans.
-
My bill does not raise taxes.
-
I believe we can fix Social Security without
raising taxes. We need to begin reforming government programs so
that they don’t become so large and expensive that future taxpayers
will be unable to pay for them. Young wage earners and small
businesses are the most vulnerable to tax increases, and they would
be the ones most adversely affected by higher taxes to save Social
Security. Additionally, whenever we increase the costs of labor we
hurt our competitive position in the world and make job creation
more difficult. This is not abstract economic theory. It is a
reality that has an impact on every American.
Those are the principles that formed the foundation
of my bill. Here is how it would work.
Personal Accounts
Upon passage of the bill, Americans 44 and younger
will be given two voluntary options: They can invest four percent of
their payroll tax into a personal investment account modeled on the same
accounts now offered to federal government employees (the remainder of
their payroll tax contribution would continue to go into the traditional
Social Security system); or
they can continue to invest their entire payroll
tax in the traditional Social Security system.
If they choose the personal account option, then
individuals will be able to invest in the same five funds that
collectively make up the current Federal Thrift Savings Plan. They are:
The Common Stock Index Fund. Over the last ten
years, it has earned an average annual rate of return of 11.99%.
The Fixed Income Index Investment Fund. Over the
last ten years, it has earned an average annual rate of return of 7.72%.
The Government Securities Investment Fund. Over the
last ten years, it has earned an average annual rate of return of 5.75%.
The Small Capitalization Stock Index Fund. Over the
last ten years, it has earned an average annual rate of return of
11.84%.
And the International Stock Index Fund. Over the
last ten years, it has earned an average annual rate of return of 5.45%.
These five funds provide a range of excellent
investment options.
My bill would also provide a "Default Account" for
those Americans who, for whatever reason, do not want to deal with
choosing a fund or funds for their accounts. This fund will invest
differently in an individual’s early working years than in their later
working years.
The Thrift Savings Program has been a success for
government employees. Last year, returns on the different accounts
ranged from just over 4 percent to 20 percent, and over the last ten
years the returns have been between 5.5 and 12 percent. Compare this
with the 3 percent return provided by Treasury Bonds that Social
Security invests in now. These private accounts are in addition to the
guaranteed Social Security benefits and personal savings, pensions and
retirement account programs individuals build up during their working
years.
Under my bill, personal accounts would be
administered by a board within the Social Security Administration called
the Social Security Investment Board. The Board would be composed of:
the Secretary of Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board,
the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and two
Senate-confirmed appointments, nominated by the President. One of the
President’s appointments would serve as Chairman of the Board.
Upon retirement, those who choose to enroll in a
personal account will have two accounts: their personal account and the
traditional Social Security benefit. They will be required to convert a
portion of their personal account to an annuity which, when added to
their guaranteed Social Security, would be at least 135 percent of
poverty. The remainder of their personal account will be theirs to spend
as they wish. It could be used to help with health care costs and
retirement living costs, or it could even help an account holder’s
children or grandchildren put a down-payment on a home, or pay college
tuition.
Why personal accounts are important
There are those who will say that allowing
individuals to invest their money through personal accounts is too
risky. Their concerns are serious and they deserve a serious response.
Under my plan, no person is required to have a
personal account. An individual who does not want to invest can keep all
of their money in the traditional Social Security system. I believe that
the policies which enhance personal freedom and responsibility encourage
the ethic of savings and limit the role of government. These are the
policies which will be most flexible and successful for America’s
future. It is true that there is no guarantee with market-based
investments, however, the historic success of markets is not a theory.
It is a fact. As columnist George Will pointed out in a recent
Washington Post column, in no 15-year period in the past eight decades
has the growth of stocks ever been negative; in no 20-year period has
the average growth been less than 3 percent, which exceeds the rate of
return on Social Security assets.
Making the Trust Fund Solvent
We are blessed in America. The vast majority of
Americans live healthier, longer lives than they did a few decades ago.
Continued advances in medicine, education, and personal health will
continue to increase not only the length of our lives, but also the
quality of our lives, providing opportunities for older Americans to
remain healthy, vital, and productive members of the workforce.
When Social Security was created in 1935, there
were too many workers and not enough jobs. According to the Social
Security Administration, in 1950 there were 16.5 workers per retiree.
Incentives were created to move people out of the workforce. This
dynamic is changing. Today, there are 3.3 workers for every retiree. In
25 years, there will be 2.1 workers for each retiree.
My bill makes three adjustments to Social Security
that will make it solvent for future generations:
First, my bill would raise the current full benefit
retirement age by one year – from 67 to 68.
Second, my bill would maintain the current early
retirement age at 62, but would adjust benefits for those who choose to
retire early. Currently, workers who retire early receive 70% of their
full retirement benefits. My bill would provide these early retirees
with 63% of the traditional benefit.
Third, currently, an individual’s base Social
Security benefit is determined by two factors: their average income over
35 years and the wage index. My bill adds a third component: life
expectancy. Over the life of the program, Social Security benefit
calculations have never been adjusted to reflect increased life
expectancy.
By factoring increased life expectancy into the
base benefit calculation, the rate of increase in benefit payments will
be slowed. No other changes will be made to the annual Consumer Price
Indexing of benefit increases.
In addition to making Social Security solvent,
these adjustments can help us confront the challenges of increasing
Medicare costs and shortages in the workforce. It is important to
protect the option of early retirement, but our laws need to encourage
individuals to stay in the work force, not leave it. Medicare costs,
Medicaid costs, and labor shortages can be significantly reduced by
keeping people healthy and productive and in the workforce.
My bill pays for these changes in Social Security
by using the existing 3.7 trillion dollar unfunded liability to ensure
the long-term health of the Social Security system. Doing nothing will
mean that at the end of 75 years, Social Security will have chewed up
3.7 trillion tax payer dollars to keep Social Security solvent and we
will still have an insolvent program with trillions of dollars more of
unfunded liabilities staring us in the face. In recent testimony before
the Senate, Alan Greenspan said Social Security’s total unfunded
liability could be as high as 10 trillion dollars over the life of the
program.
Close
I have introduced this bill because I believe that
leaders have a responsibility to deal with the great challenges of their
time – not defer them, but to try to fix them and come up with
solutions. I do not hold my bill up as the only way to address the
solvency of Social Security. It is one way....there may be better ways.
No comprehensive bill will be immune from critical evaluation....nor
should it be. However, I think my bill is a common sense, responsible,
and fiscally accountable place to start.
All Americans need to ask tough questions about the
future of Social Security. We need to begin the process of refining
ideas to forge the best, most responsible policy for the future.
President Bush deserves credit for making the
modernization of Social Security a central part of his second term
agenda. There is no possibility for success in modernizing Social
Security without strong Presidential leadership.
As I said at the beginning of my speech, Social
Security is one of the most important and successful government programs
in American history. Since 1935, it has provided a safety net for our
society’s most vulnerable. We have a high moral obligation to ensure
that future generations continue to benefit from this safety net and
social contract we have with our citizens. But in order to do this, we
must fix the system.
This is a personal issue for me. Forty years from
now, a young mother in Columbus, Nebraska may be left to raise four
children on her own. I want her family to have the same access to the
same safety net that my family had, and the promise that no matter where
you start in life, with just a little help, you can finish where you
want.
I am 58 years old. I am at the front end of the
"baby boom" generation. My daughter is 14 years-old and my son is 12
years-old. I don’t want to fail their generation. That means addressing
these entitlement program issues now while we have time to do it in a
responsible way.
This is a defining debate for today’s leaders.
Doing nothing is irresponsible and cowardly. It is in every American’s
interest to deal with this challenge now. We have it in us to do what
needs to be done. We can preserve, protect, and improve Social Security
for all future generations of Americans.
###
The Saving Social Security Act of 2005
U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE)
SIX PRINCIPLES OF THE HAGEL SOCIAL SECURITY BILL:
Will make Social Security solvent for future
generations.
Will not change Social Security for anyone over the
age of 44.
Will give Americans under the age of 45 the option
of opening a voluntary personal account through Social Security.
Will provide a guaranteed Social Security benefit
for all working Americans.
Will not reduce or change Social Security survivor
or disability benefits.
Will not raise taxes.
Details of the Hagel Bill
I. Eligibility:
For Americans 45 and older: The Hagel Bill
maintains the current system.
For Americans 44 and younger: The Hagel Bill
provides two voluntary options –
1) Invest 4 percent of their payroll tax into a
personal investment account modeled on the same accounts offered to
federal government employees (the remainder of their payroll tax
contribution would continue to go into the traditional Social Security
system); or
2) Continue to invest their entire payroll tax in
the traditional Social Security system.
For Survivors and the Disabled: The Hagel Bill
maintains the current system. Additionally, survivor beneficiaries would
receive the funds in the deceased’s personal retirement account.
For Public Employees: The Hagel Bill continues the
current exemption for those state and local government employees who do
not currently participate in the Social Security system.
II. Making the Trust Fund Solvent:
Social Security faces a $3.7 trillion unfunded
liability over the next 75 years.
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has said
that Social Security will face a $10 trillion unfunded liability over
the life of the program.
The Hagel Bill would make Social Security solvent
for future generations within 75 years by making the following three
adjustments to the Social Security system.
Retirement Age: The Hagel Bill would raise the
current full benefit retirement age by one year – from 67 to 68.
Early Retirement Benefits: The Hagel Bill would
maintain the current early retirement age at 62, but would adjust
benefits for those who choose to retire early. Currently, workers who
retire early receive 70% of the traditional benefit. The Hagel Bill
would provide these workers with 63% of the traditional benefit. This
provision originated from the President’s 2002 Social Security
Commission.
Life Expectancy: Currently, an individual’s base
Social Security benefit is determined by two factors: their average
income over 35 years and the wage index. The Hagel Bill adds a third
component: life expectancy. Over the life of the program, Social
Security benefit calculations have never been adjusted to reflect
increased life expectancy.
By factoring increased life expectancy into the
base benefit calculation, the rate of increase in benefit payments will
be slowed. It will also ensure Social Security’s solvency for
generations to come. No other changes will be made to benefit
calculations.
III. Structure of Personal Accounts:
• The bill creates a Social Security Investment
Board, within the Social Security Administration, modeled on the Federal
Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) Board. The Board would create and provide
oversight of a new voluntary program allowing workers to set-up personal
investment accounts.
• The Board will be composed of the following 5
members: the Secretary of the Treasury; the Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Board; the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission;
and two Senate-confirmed appointments, nominated by the President, of
whom one shall be designated by the President as Chairman.
• The two appointed members shall serve a term of 6
years. The Board will appoint an Executive Director to manage the duties
of the Board.
IV. Types of Investments for Personal Accounts:
Several private investment management firms, under
contract with the Board, will manage the personal accounts. The Board
will centrally administer the accounts.
All fees associated with the management of the
account will be negotiated by the Board. Under the Federal Thrift
Savings Plan, participants last year paid about 57 cents in
administrative fees for every $1000 invested. Based on economies of
scale, these fees would be expected to be smaller in the Hagel Bill.
• The Board would offer individuals the same five
index funds offered under the current Federal Thrift Savings Plan for
federal employees. The five index funds are:
• The "C" fund is a common stock index fund
invested in the stocks of all corporations represented in the Standard
and Poor's 500 index. Between 1995-2004, the "C" fund earned an average
annual rate of return of 11.99%.
• The "F" fund, or "Fixed Income Index Investment
Fund," is invested in a bond index fund that tracks the performance of
the Shearson Lehman Brothers Aggregate bond index. These securities
consist of government bonds, corporate bonds, and mortgage-backed
securities. Between 1995-2004, the "F" fund earned an average annual
rate of return of 7.72%.
The "G" fund consists of U.S. government securities and pays interest
equal to the average rate of return on long-term U.S. government bonds.
Between 1995-2004, the "G" fund earned an average annual rate of return
of 5.75%.
The "S" fund (Small Capitalization Stock Index
Fund) invests in a portfolio of common stocks that matches the stocks in
the Wilshire 4500 index. The average annual rate of return on the
Wilshire 4500 from 1995 through 2004 was 11.84%.
The "I" fund (International Stock Index Fund)
invests in the common stocks of foreign corporations represented in the
Morgan Stanley Capital Investment EAFE (Europe, Australia-Asia, Far
East) index. The average annual rate of return on the EAFE Index from
1995 through 2004 was 5.45%.
Default Account: In addition to the five index
funds, the Board will offer individuals a defaulted "life-span account"
that invests aggressively in a worker’s early years and less
aggressively in the later years. The investment starts off as a blend of
80% stock/20% bonds and moves along a sliding scale over the life of the
account to 35% stock/65% bonds.
* The Federal Thrift Savings plan is currently
looking at adding this option.
V. Requirements for Personal Accounts:
• Amount of Investment: Individuals participating
in the program will be allowed to invest four percentage points of their
12.4% payroll tax into a personal account. Individuals and their
employers would still be required to contribute 8.4 percent of their
payroll tax into the Social Security Trust Fund.
• Opt-Out: New workers will automatically be
enrolled in a personal account, unless the worker chooses to opt-out.
Individuals will have until their 25th birthday to cancel their personal
account and return to the traditional Social Security system. Upon
enactment of the bill, all workers over the age of 25 will have 12
months to opt-out following enactment.
Beneficiaries: Account holders will be required to
designate a beneficiary. This beneficiary will be entitled to the
balance of the personal account upon the death of the primary account
holder. Eligible beneficiaries would continue to receive the survivor
benefits to which they are entitled.
Note: Funds cannot be withdrawn from personal
accounts until retirement or death.
VI. Retirement Benefits:
Upon retirement, an individual who chooses to
invest in a personal account will have two accounts: their personal
account and their traditional Social Security benefit.
Individuals with a personal account will be
required to use enough of their personal account to purchase an annuity
which when added to their traditional Social Security account will equal
no less than 135% of the poverty level. The Federal Government will
guarantee this monthly benefit until their death.
Once an annuity is purchased, an individual will
have the freedom to choose what to do with the balance of their personal
account. It can be used to increase their monthly annuity payment,
re-invested, used for retirement costs, or passed on to children and
grandchildren.
Those who opt to stay in the traditional Social
Security system will receive the same Social Security benefits as the
current system adjusted for increased life expectancy.
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |