|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Social Security Privatization Opposed by Seniors, Favored by
Younger People: Gallup Poll
Jan. 5, 2004 - Fifty-seven percent of those under age 50
favor the proposal to allow workers to invest a portion of their Social Security
taxes in the stock market, compared with only 37% of those aged 50 and older,
says the Gallup Poll. Read this poll and Gallup's survey of other polls below.
Public Divided on Social Security Privatization
Americans rate Social Security as
high-priority item
by Jeffrey M. Jones
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE -
Click
PRINCETON, NJ, Jan. 5, 2004 -- George W. Bush has made Social Security reform a top
priority for his second term in office. Americans agree that it should be high on
the legislative agenda, but don't necessarily agree with a proposal to allow
workers to invest a portion of their Social Security taxes in the stock market
-- something Bush supports. In part, support depends on how the program is
described to survey respondents, with support levels in recent polls ranging
from 48% to 60%. If Social Security is indeed partially privatized, slightly
more than 4 in 10 Americans expect it will not affect them personally, but
those who feel they would be affected are about evenly divided as to whether it
would help or hurt them.
A Dec. 17-19 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll finds 82% of Americans
saying it is at least very important for Congress and the president to deal
with Social Security in the next year, including 40% who say it is extremely
important. These figures are in line with what Gallup found in 2002 and 2003.

Among the 18 policy issues whose importance Americans rated, Social Security
ranks among the top 6, behind Iraq (90%), terrorism (87%), healthcare costs
(87%), the economy (86%), and education (86%).
Private Investment of Social Security Taxes
One prominent Social Security proposal attracting a lot of attention is the
idea of allowing workers to invest part of their Social Security taxes in the
stock market. This would provide the possibility of greater returns on a
person's investment, but also carries more risk than the safe investments in
which the government currently invests Social Security revenues. According to
the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, the public is divided over such a
proposal, with 48% in favor and 48% opposed.
The measured level of support for partial Social Security privatization
depends somewhat on how the program is described to respondents. Various recent
polls have shown support levels for the privatization plan ranging from almost
half to 60%.
-
A recent Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll finds 60%
saying "people should have the choice to invest privately up to 5% of
their Social Security contributions." Only 27% say they should not.
This question talks about giving workers the choice and puts a specific
number (5%) on how much of the taxes could be invested.
-
An ABC News/Washington Post poll finds
majority support (53%) for "a plan in which people who chose to could
invest some of their Social Security contributions in the stock
market." Again, this question touches on the "choice"
aspect of the program. But only 46% of those who initially said they
supported the program continued to do so when they were told that
instituting the system may necessitate the government's borrowing up to $2
trillion to set it up.
-
A CBS News/New York Times poll finds 49%
saying it is a "good idea" to allow "individuals to invest
portions of their Social Security taxes on their own." Forty-five
percent say it is a "bad idea."
-
Previous Gallup questions specifying that a portion
of Social Security contributions could be invested in "personal
retirement accounts" found higher support for privatization than does
the current wording that simply talks about investments in stocks and
bonds.
The most recent Gallup data show that support for
private investment of Social Security taxes varies by subgroup. As is typically
the case, younger Americans are much more likely to favor the proposal than are
older Americans. Fifty-seven percent of those under age 50 favor the proposal,
compared with 37% of those aged 50 and older.

Also, those residing in higher-income households are
much more likely to favor the proposal. Sixty percent of Americans living in
households whose incomes are $75,000 or more say they favor it. That drops to
51% in households having incomes between $30,000 and $74,999, and 34% in those
with incomes less than $30,000.

Perhaps because President Bush has strongly endorsed
this reform proposal, Republicans (69%) are nearly three times as likely as
Democrats (26%) to favor it.
Expected Personal Impact of Social Security
Privatization
The plurality of Americans, 43%, say the proposal to
allow private investment of Social Security taxes would have no effect on them
personally if it becomes law. Another 29% say it would help them and 26% say it
would hurt.
These perceptions also vary by age -- those under age 50
are nearly twice as likely to think passage of the proposal would help (42%) rather
than hurt (23%) them. The vast majority of Americans currently at retirement
age (65 and older), 70%, believe passage of the proposal would not affect them.
Those in the pre-retirement years (50 to 64 years old) are most pessimistic:
nearly twice as many people in this age group think the proposal would hurt
(33%) -- rather than help (19%) -- them.

Household income levels are also related to the way
Americans expect passage of the proposal to affect them. The greater the
household income, the more likely people are to think the proposal will help
them personally; the less the household income, the more likely people are to
think the proposal will hurt them.

Expected Impact of Social Security Privatization on the System
Americans are generally divided in their views on how partially privatizing
Social Security would affect the Social Security system and the federal budget.
Perceptions of the impact of partial Social Security
privatization on the system and the federal budget vary significantly by
partisanship. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats
to expect positive results, and much less likely to anticipate negative
results, from the proposal.
|
|
Overall
|
Democrat
|
Independent
|
Republican
|
|
Deficit would increase |
49%
|
60%
|
51%
|
36%
|
|
Future benefits reduced |
58%
|
71%
|
57%
|
45%
|
|
System stronger in long run |
47%
|
28%
|
51%
|
64%
|
|
Current benefits reduced |
46%
|
59%
|
48%
|
32%
|
Survey Methods
These results are based on telephone interviews with a
randomly selected national sample of 1,002 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted
Dec. 17-19, 2004. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95%
confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random
effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question
wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or
bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
Thinking now about Social Security,
16. As you may know, a proposal has been made that
would allow workers to invest part of their Social Security taxes in the stock
market or in bonds, while the rest of those taxes would remain in the Social
Security system. Do you favor or oppose this proposal?
|
|
Favor
|
Oppose
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19 |
48%
|
48
|
4
|
17. If this proposal becomes law, do you think it
will mostly -- [ROTATED: help you personally, have no effect, or mostly hurt
you personally]?
|
|
Help
|
No effect
|
Hurt
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19
|
29%
|
43
|
26
|
2
|
18. If this proposal becomes law, do you think each
of the following would -- or would not -- happen? How about -- [ITEMS A-C
ROTATED, ITEM D READ LAST]?
A. The federal budget deficit would increase
significantly
|
|
Yes, would
|
No, would not
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19 |
49%
|
43
|
8
|
B. The guaranteed Social Security benefits to
future recipients would be reduced
|
|
Yes, would
|
No, would not
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19 |
58%
|
36
|
6
|
C. The Social Security system would be stronger
in the long run
|
|
Yes, would
|
No, would not
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19 |
47%
|
47
|
6
|
D. Current Social Security recipients would
receive less money in their Social Security checks
|
|
Yes, would
|
No, would not
|
No opinion
|
|
2004 Dec 17-19 |
46%
|
48
|
6
|
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |