SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

  General Features

  Find Help

  SENIOR ALERTS

  Baby Boomers

  Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

  Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

Get Instant Supplemental Medicare Insurance Quotes.

• Go to more Social Security News or More Senior News on the Front Page

Find the Best Medicare Advantage Plans for Seniors

 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Social Security News

Social Security Will Not Have COLA Increase in 2011; No Surprise but Official This Friday

Senior citizens doing better than most since recession; See below - history of COLAs, Social Security Q&A, related links

Oct. 11, 2010 – Senior citizens have known since last year that they are not likely to receive a cost-of-living adjustment in their Social Security checks for 2011, due to the lack of inflation, which determines the COLA each October. The Associated Press notes this official word will be released by Social Security on Friday.

Social Security benefits usually increase each year based on the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). This increase, however, is based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI-W) growth from October 1 of one year through September of the next.

No growth through September of 2009 resulted in no COLA for 2010. The same thing seems certain this year and maybe next, according to experts.

“It would mark only the second year without an increase since automatic adjustments for inflation were adopted in 1975. The first year was this year,” reports the AP.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Social Security Trustees Report Long-Range Financing Outlook Remains Unchanged

Trust Funds exhausted in 2037, same as projected last year; enter red ink in 2015

Aug. 6, 2010


Social Security Can Be Fixed with Just Modest Changes: Senate Committee on Aging

Chairman Kohl sends to Congress various options committee found for consideration

May 18, 2010


Declining Social Security Benefits Keeping Older Men In Workforce, Study Finds

 

 
 

David Blau

 

‘Older individuals don’t get the same level of Social Security benefits when they retire as they once did’

May 4, 2010


Social Security Makes It Official: No COLA Increase for Seniors in 2010 Due to No Inflation

SSA calls for passage of $250 payment to each senior citizen as recommended by President Obama

Oct. 15, 2009


Senior Citizens May Not Get Social Security COLA for Years Says Kaiser Medicare Brief

No Social Security increase also means higher Medicare Part B fees for many seniors says the analysis

June 29, 2009


Sen. Kohl to Offer Senate Aging Committee as Repository for Social Security Reform Ideas

Chairman will make this announcement at hearing Wednesday on Social Security

June 15, 2009


Bad News: Social Security Going into Red One Year Sooner; Good News: Part of Problem is We Live Longer

Social Security Trustees issue annual report on financial health of trust funds; feeling impact of economic downturn

May 12, 2009


Read more Social Security News

 

"If you're the ruling party, this is not the sort of thing you want to have happening two weeks before an election," said Andrew Biggs, a former deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration and now a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

"It's not the congressional Democrats' fault, but that's the way politics works," Biggs said. "A lot of people will feel hostile about it."

The projection will be made official on Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases inflation estimates for September. (Click to the AP story)

Senior citizens doing better than most

Senior citizens, however, are still fairing better than most since the Great Recession began in 1997, according to a recent report by the Pew Research Center.

About seven-in-ten retirees and other older adults largely held their own during the recession, while an equally lopsided majority of 20-somethings did not, according to the recent survey by Pew. The analysis – “One Recession, Two Americas” - written by Rich Morin, Senior Editor was published September 24.

“As seen in earlier reports,” writes Morin, “older adults have been more sheltered from the worst of the recession than younger people. According to the analysis, about seven-in-ten people 65 and older Held their Own during the recession, compared with 31% of those 18 to 29 and about four-in-ten adults ages 30 to 49 (40%) and 50 to 64 (44%).”

“More than six-in-ten retirees (64%) have faced relatively few economic hardships during the recession and fall into the group that Held their Own while 36% Lost Ground,” according to the report.

National Academy of Social Insurance Analysis

Social Security beneficiaries include 33.7 million retired workers, 4.4 million widows and widowers, and 2.5 million spouses. About 7.8 million disabled workers receive benefits, along with 0.9 million severely disabled adult children of deceased, retired, or disabled workers. Another 3.2 million children under age 18 receive benefits because their parent died, became disabled, or retired (SSA 2010a), according to a report by the National Academy of Social Insurance.

How much does Social Security pay?

The average monthly benefit paid to retired workers was $1,166 (about $14,000 annually) in January 2010 (SSA 2010a). The average benefit was somewhat smaller for disabled workers ($1,064) and for widows and widowers age 60 or older ($1,125).

Benefits are somewhat higher for families. Widowed mothers with two children received $2,404, on average, or about $28,850 a year, while disabled workers with a young spouse and one or more children received $1,797 a month, on average, or about $21,560 a year (SSA 2010b). For comparison, the 2010 federal poverty guideline for a family of three is $18,310 a year; for a family of four it is $22,050 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2009).

Social Security is the main source of income for most beneficiaries 65 years of age or older. The benefits account for half or more of total income for one out of two beneficiary married couples and 72 percent of nonmarried beneficiaries (SSA 2010c). For all but the highest-income 20 percent of older Americans, Social Security is the largest single source of income.

Security: Adequate Benefits, Adequate Financing.

Table 1. Average Monthly Benefits, January 2010

Type of Beneficiary Benefit

   ● Retired workers $1,166

   ● Aged widows and widowers alone $1,125

   ● Disabled worker alone $1,064

   ● Widowed mother and two children $2,404

   ● Disabled worker, young spouse and one or more children $1,797

Source: Social Security Administration 2010.

(click to NSAI pdf report)

History of Automatic Cost-Of-Living Adjustments

History of COLA for Social Security

Year

Month

COLA

1975

July

8.0%

1976

July

6.4%

1977

July

5.9%

1978

July

6.5%

1979

July

9.9%

1980

July

14.3%

1981

July

11.2%

1982

July

7.4%

1984

January

3.5%

1985

January

3.5%

1986

January

3.1%

1987

January

1.3%

1988

January

4.2%

1989

January

4.0%

1990

January

4.7%

1991

January

5.4%

1992

January

3.7%

1993

January

3.0%

1994

January

2.6%

1995

January

2.8%

1996

January

2.6%

1997

January

2.9%

1998

January

2.1%

1999

January

1.3%

2000

January

2.5%

2001

January

3.5%

2002

January

2.6%

2003

January

1.4%

2004

January

2.1%

2005

January

2.7%

2006

January

4.1%

2007

January

3.3%

2008

January

2.3%

2009

January

5.8%

2010

January

0.0%

2011

January

0.0%??

Automatic benefit increases, also known as cost-of-living adjustments or COLAs, have been in effect since 1975.

The 1975-82 COLAs were effective with Social Security benefits payable for June (received by beneficiaries in July) in each of those years; thereafter COLAs have been effective with benefits payable for December (received by beneficiaries in January). COLAs received in 1975-2010 are shown below.

The COLA for December 1999 (reflected in Jan. 2000) was originally determined as 2.4 percent based on CPIs published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Pursuant to Public Law 106-554, however, this COLA is effectively now 2.5 percent.

The first automatic COLA, for June 1975, was based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the second quarter of 1974 to the first quarter of 1975.

The 1976-82 COLAs were based on increases in the CPI-W from the first quarter of the prior year to the corresponding quarter of the current year in which the COLA became effective.

After 1982, COLAs have been based on increases in the CPI-W from the third quarter of the prior year to the corresponding quarter of the current year in which the COLA became effective. 

Frequently Asked Questions About the 2010 Cost-of-Living Adjustment

The Q&A below was released by Social Security Administration last year to explain the consequences of now increase for 2010. It should be applicable to 2011, as well.

Q.  What is a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)?

A.  A COLA is an automatic adjustment in benefits that occurs annually.  The purpose of the COLA is to ensure that the purchasing power of Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits is not eroded by inflation.  It is based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter of one year to the third quarter of the next.  If there is no increase, there is no COLA.

Q.  Who determines the CPI-W?

A.  The CPI-W is determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Department of Labor.  It is the federal government’s official measure used to calculate COLAs.

Q.  Why is there no COLA for 2010?

A.  By law, Social Security and Supplemental Security Income benefits increase automatically each year if there is an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), from the third quarter of the last year to the corresponding period of the current year.  This year there was no increase in the CPI-W from the third quarter of 2008 to the third quarter of 2009.

Q.  If there is no COLA, will my benefits stay the same?

A. If there is no COLA, your Social Security and SSI benefits will remain the same.

Q.  Will the maximum taxable earnings amount change in 2010?

A.  No.  Because there is no COLA, the Social Security Act prohibits an increase in the contribution and benefit base (Social Security’s maximum taxable earnings), which normally increases with increases in the national average wage index.  The maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax (taxable maximum) will remain $106,800.

Q.  Will the retirement earnings test exempt amounts change in 2010?

A.  No.  Because there is no COLA, the Social Security Act prohibits an increase in the retirement earnings test exempt amounts.  The earnings limit for workers who are younger than “full” retirement age (age 66 for people born in 1943 through 1954) will remain $14,160.  (We deduct $1 from benefits for each $2 earned over $14,160.)  The earnings limit for people turning 66 in 2010 still will be $37,680.  (We deduct $1 from benefits for each $3 earned over $37,680 until the month the worker turns age 66.)  There is no limit on earnings for workers who are “full” retirement age or older for the entire year.

Q.  If Medicare premiums increase in 2010, will my Social Security benefit be reduced?

A.  The law contains a “hold harmless” provision that protects about 93 percent of Social Security beneficiaries from paying a higher Part B premium, in order to avoid reducing their net Social Security benefit.  Those not protected include higher income beneficiaries subject to an income-adjusted Part B premium and beneficiaries newly entitled to Part B in 2010.

If a beneficiary subject to IRMAA in the current year will not be subject to IRMAA in the next year, the “hold harmless” provision can apply.

There is no “hold harmless” provision for Medicare Parts C and D, meaning that beneficiaries must pay any higher premiums.

Q.  How long has Social Security had COLAs?

A.  Congress enacted the COLA provision as part of the 1972 Social Security Amendments, and automatic annual COLAs began in 1975.  Before that, benefits were increased only when Congress enacted special legislation.

For additional information about the 2010 COLA, go to www.socialsecurity.gov/cola.

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Keep up with the latest news for senior citizens, baby boomers

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.