|
How Long Men
Live May Depend on Their Parents, Childhood
March 22, 2004 - How
long a man lives is partially determined by his childhood conditions
and experience, according to an extensive study, which concludes that
men face higher risk of early death if they grew up in
blue-collar homes, lived in urban areas, lived with their biological
fathers and a stepmother, had a mother who worked outside the home,
whose parents were both native born and had few economic resources.
Having parents who worked in
professional jobs, growing up on a farm, and growing up in a two-parent
family lowered significantly the risk of death for men after age 45. In
large part, the association between a healthy environment in childhood
and good health in old age is explained by the achievements and
lifestyle behaviors of the men in their own adult careers -- those who
had favorable conditions as boys were less likely as older men to smoke,
drink excessively, or be obese. They were more likely than their
contemporaries from poorer childhood homes to finish high school or
college and work as adults in occupations that were cognitively
challenging and offered autonomy. Men who had lived at age 15 with a
stepfather and a mother who worked outside the home (at a time when far
fewer mothers worked) had a risk of mortality at older ages almost 1.5
times as great as those who had lived with both biological parents.
The social settings of early life have
far-reaching consequences, affecting the risk of death even decades
later. Adult mortality is the long-term outcome of a range of childhood
conditions and experiences, beginning in the womb and influenced by the
cumulative experiences of adulthood, say sociologists Mark D. Hayward,
Ph.D., of Penn State University and Bridget K. Gorman, Ph.D., of Rice
University and the University of Texas, who studied the lives of 5,000
men born between 1906 and 1921. The men were interviewed in 1966 about
their family backgrounds at age 15, as well as other health-related
issues, and they were tracked for 24 years after the first interview.
The research appears in the journal
Demography.
Other researchers have found that
childhood circumstances have a cascading effect on adult life that then
result in a greater risk of death. Everything from a childs education
or disease exposure to parents financial standing or birthplace can
affect the later course of life.
For instance, those early circumstances
might direct a young persons career choice, which in turn would dictate
income, lifestyle, insurance coverage or workplace hazards, any of which
might influence health and the length of life.
Hayward and Gormans study suggests that
childhood does not affect longevity in simple, straightforward ways. The
health of adults appears to be the outcome of childhood circumstances
plus adult socioeconomic resources and lifestyles, they say.
Hayward and Gorman evaluated data
collected in the 1966 National Longitudinal Survey of Older Men. The men
were then 45 to 59 years old and were followed until 1990. They were
queried about social, economic and lifestyle information in adulthood,
as well as their circumstances at age 15. Of the 5,000 subjects
interviewed in 1966, Hayward and Gorman were able to analyze death
information on 2,346.
They found that the circumstances of
youth did influence outcomes later in life, from ages 45 to 83.
The mens childhood surroundings in the
1920s and 1930s reflected their times. About 28 percent lived in small
towns and 35 percent lived on farms. Only 20 percent lived in cities
with more than 100,000 people. Almost half the heads of their households
had less than a ninth-grade education. Almost 22 percent of the men had
two foreign-born parents and 60 percent of their mothers did not work
outside the home. Three out of four grew up with both biological
parents.
Decades later, these factors came into
play at the end of their lives. Men who grew up on farms, for instance,
had a better chance at a longer life than men who grew up in large
cities. Those whose mothers and fathers were both immigrants had longer
life expectancy than sons of native-born couples. Men from families with
two biological parents had lower mortality than those from families with
a step-father. The life expectancy of men from families where the head
of the household worked in a white-collar job exceeded that for men from
blue-collar homes.
Many of these effects, however, operated
through adult achievement and lifestyles. So, men reared in white collar
homes benefited from greater educational attainment, income and wealth
and intrinsically rewarding jobs. Men reared in families with two
biological parents or on farms were less likely to be overweight as
adults, which reduced their chances of early death.
This research was partially funded by
grants from the National Institute on Aging and the National Institute
of Child Health and Development. |