|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Senior Citizen Politics
GOP Fails to Derail Democrat’s SCHIP Bill that
Includes Medicare Changes
Republicans offer their
bill, says cost could be paid by cuts in Medicare, Medicaid
July 26, 2007 – Republicans on the House Energy and
Commerce Committee lost a bid today to table a Democratic bill, the
Children’s Health and Medicare Protection Act, which makes significant
changes in Medicare. Yesterday, the Democrats delayed the vote to allow
Republican’s more time to study the measure. But, it also gave them time
to introduce their own version, which Committee ranking member Joe
Barton (R-Texas) said could be paid for by cuts in Medicare and
Medicaid.
In the vote today, the GOP failed by a vote of 29
to 23 to table the Democrat’s bill, which Chairman John Dingell (D-Mich.)
is now calling the CHAMP Act (the Children’s
Health and Medicare Protection Act).
Below is the report
today from KaiserNetwork.org on yesterday’s actions.
House Committee Postpones Vote on SCHIP
Legislation Amid Bipartisan Concerns
House Energy and
Commerce Committee Chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) postponed
until Thursday a planned vote on legislation (HR
3162) that would reduce payments to Medicare Advantage plans
and increase the federal cigarette tax by 45 cents per pack to fund the
reauthorization and expansion of SCHIP and make revisions to Medicare,
CQ Today
reports.
The vote originally was scheduled for Wednesday
(Wayne, CQ
Today, 7/25). The legislation, called the Children's
Health and Medicare Protection Act, would increase SCHIP funding by $50
billion over five years.
Under the bill, a scheduled 10% cut in Medicare
payments to physicians would be reversed and physicians would receive a
0.5% increase in fees for each of the next two years. The measure also
would freeze reimbursement rate increases to skilled nursing facilities,
home health agencies and long-term care hospitals, while increasing by
1% rates to inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
The bill would equalize payments between MA plans
and traditional Medicare over five years, reducing federal
reimbursements by nearly $50 billion over that time period. In addition,
the bill would make revisions to the system that sets spending targets
for Medicare outlays for physicians' care. SCHIP is set to expire on
Sept. 30 (Kaiser
Daily Health Policy Report, 7/25).
Republicans were "angry that they had been given
less than 24 hours to review" the bill and threatened to use procedural
tactics to slow committee review, according to
CQ Today.
Committee ranking member Joe Barton (R-Texas)
accused Dingell of moving quickly on the bill as a way to avoid public
scrutiny. In addition, some Democrats "voiced unease" over the tobacco
tax increase and the bill's broad scope,
CQ Today
reports (CQ
Today, 7/25). A committee aide said, "Committee members on
both sides of the aisle have asked for and have been granted additional
time to review the legislation" (Johnson/Bourge,
CongressDaily,
7/25).
CBO Report
House Democrats' SCHIP measure would cost $86.8
billion over five years and could cost $160 billion over 10 years,
according to a preliminary
Congressional
Budget Office report released Wednesday. According to CBO,
reversing scheduled Medicare reimbursement cuts for physicians would
cost $100 billion over a decade, and total spending, including cuts made
to private MA plans, would increase by $130 billion over 10 years.
In addition, cuts to MA plans would generate $50.2
billion over five years and $157.1 billion over 10 years, the CBO report
states. In a letter accompanying the report, CBO Director Peter Orszag
wrote that House Ways and Means
Health
Subcommittee Chair Pete Stark (D-Calif.) is revising the
legislation, which likely will change the cost and savings estimates.
>> The report is available
online.
Note: You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the document.
House Republican Bill
Meanwhile, Barton and other Republican lawmakers on
Wednesday introduced their own SCHIP reauthorization legislation that
would limit eligibility in the program to children in families with
incomes up to 200% of the federal poverty level. States that provide
coverage to 90% of children with incomes no more that twice the poverty
level could expand eligibility to children in families with incomes up
to 250% of the poverty level, according to the legislation.
Barton estimates the measure would cost an
additional $5 billion to $10 billion over five years, which he said
could be offset through cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. Barton said, for
example, beneficiaries and pharmacists could be required to use
electronic prescriptions, which might save the programs $3 billion
annually.
The legislation also would bar states from allowing
beneficiaries to exclude certain expenses, such as car payments, from
their reported income to qualify for SCHIP. In addition, the measure
would cancel SCHIP coverage for adults beginning in fiscal year 2009 and
prohibit the federal government from issuing waivers to states to expand
coverage of adults (CQ
Today, 7/25).
Chances of Passage
While Democrats and many Republicans "agree with
the underlying goal" of House and Senate versions of SCHIP legislation,
"both chambers are bracing for a conference committee fight over a
cigarette tax increase and cuts to private" MA plans,
CongressDaily
reports.
A proposed 45-cent-per-pack cigarette tax increase
in the House has been met with resistance from both Republicans and some
Democrats, making it "difficult for members to come to terms with" the
Senate's
proposed
61-cent-per-pack increase. Some lawmakers feel that a 61-cent tax
increase is too large and does not provide coverage for enough children,
according to House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).
In addition, a House provision that provides SCHIP
funding by equalizing payments to MA plans likely will meet resistance
in the Senate, as it does not have 60 votes to overcome a filibuster,
according to Republican aides.
Even if a conference committee is able to reach an
agreement on SCHIP legislation, it is unclear how Congress would proceed
if President Bush vetoes the measure, according to Rep. G. K.
Butterfield (D-N.C.) (Johnson/Bourge,
CongressDaily,
7/26). Some predict that SCHIP legislation "could be the first Bush veto
to be overridden since he took office," according to the
Los Angeles Times (Alonso-Zaldivar,
Los Angeles Times,
7/26). However, some Republicans "are not convinced that [Bush] will
follow through" on his veto threat (Weisman,
Washington Post, 7/26).
Insurers' Response
Health insurers "wasted no time" Wednesday
denouncing the House version of SCHIP legislation for its proposed cuts
to MA plans,
CQ HealthBeat reports.
America's Health
Insurance Plans President Karen Ignagni said that the House
bill would cause "the end of the [MA] program," and
BlueCross and
BlueShield Association President Scott Serota warned that
"millions will pay more and get less and not understand why they have
lost this valuable option."
According to Serota, the "massive cuts" in the bill
along with an "unprecedented level of government overregulation ...
would make it impossible for private plans to continue their partnership
with the federal government." AHIP will launch an advertising campaign
against the cuts that features actual MA beneficiaries voicing concerns
over the cuts. According to the ad, lawmakers who vote for MA cuts are
"not too concerned about the millions ... who will be forced to pay more
for health care and lose benefits we depend on every day" (Reichard,
CQ HealthBeat,
7/25).
Business Coalition
Reauthorization of SCHIP is the first step toward
the goal of universal health coverage,
Service Employees
International Union President Andy Stern,
Business
Roundtable President John Castellani and
AARP
CEO Bill Novelli said on Wednesday at a rally on Capitol Hill,
CongressDaily
reports.
Stern, Castellani and Novelli appeared to promote
the "Divided We Fail" campaign, which urges lawmakers and presidential
candidates to advance universal health care proposals. "It's a
meaningful step toward universal coverage, and there is nothing more
important than our children," Novelli said. Castellani added, "Our joint
message for our political leaders is this: the time for rhetoric is
over. It's time to act" (Wegner,
CongressDaily,
7/25).
Leavitt Comments
HHS
Secretary Mike Leavitt in Utah on Wednesday said the debate between the
Bush administration and Congress over SCHIP funding levels is about
ideological differences on whether the government or private sector
should run the health care system.
Leavitt said that the Bush administration supports
SCHIP, but it does "not support ... a huge expansion of the program."
Leavitt called House and Senate Democrats' proposals to expand the
program "radical" and said Democrats were attempting to create a
government-run health care system in the U.S. (Burr,
Salt Lake Tribune, 7/26).
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |