|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Looming Crisis of Long-Term Care Highlighted in New
Study
March 1, 2006 With Americans living longer, the
risks of needing long-term care is increasing. A new study says senior
citizens currently turning 65 face an average of three years of need for
LTC some time before they die, with one in five expected to need five
years of care or more. Much of the care will be provided by family
members. Though half of today's retirees will incur no out-of-pocket
expenses for LTC, 1 percent will need more than $250,000 of their own
money set aside and invested at age 65 to pay for their future care.
| |
Related Stories |
|
| |
New Law Pushes Long-Term Care Insurance Coverage
By Daniel C. Vock, Stateline.org Staff Writer
Feb. 20, 2006 - Thanks to a new federal law, states
will be able to reward senior citizens who buy long-term care insurance
by letting them hang on to assets while Medicaid pays for their nursing
home care. Read more...
Why Planning for Long-Term Care is Necessary in
Todays World
By Robert Valentine,
Certified Senior Advisor
Feb. 11, 2006 - James and Irene Norris spent their
lives surviving. The two owned and operated a small business together
for over 60 years, surviving the stock market crash, the Great
Depression, seventeen U.S. Presidencies, and two World-Wars. All while
raising two sons. But there was one thing they didnt plan on: long-term
care. Read
more...
Long-Term Crisis
Only 1 in 4 U.S. Adults Think They
Can Pay for Long-Term Care
41% Confident they do not have
enough money, 33% Unsure
Feb. 1, 2006 - Only a quarter (26%) of U.S. adults
think they have or will have saved enough money to finance their own
potential long-term care needs as they age. Fully 41 percent do not
think they will have enough money to cover their expenses as they age
and 33 percent are not sure. These findings are in a new Wall Street
Journal Online/Harris Interactive Personal Finance Poll.
Read more...
Read the Four-Part Series on Long-Term Care
Facing the Long-Term (Care) Nightmare: Part 1
Dont Rely On
Medicaid For Long-Term Care: Part 2
Bridging the Long-Term Care Gap: Part 3
Understanding Long Term Care Insurance: Part 4
Read more on
Money Matters & Insurance and
Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors |
|
This analysis by Peter Kemper (Pennsylvania State
University), Harriet L. Komisar (Georgetown University), and Lisa
Alecxih (Lewin Group), examines the LTC needs, use and cost of care
65-year-olds face over the rest of their lives. It is published in the
winter issue of INQUIRY, "Long-Term Care Over an Uncertain Future: What
Can Current Retirees Expect?,"
The authors estimated lifetime outcomes, basing
need for LTC - facility care, formal home care services and informal
care provided at home by family members - on a moderate level of
disability in activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bathing and
getting to the toilet, and in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLS)
such as shopping, preparing meals and managing money.
Perhaps most important are the study's insights
about the LTC experiences that individuals - and their families - can
expect.
● Sixty-five percent of all people 65 will spend
some time at home needing LTC;
● 30 percent will receive care at home for more than two years; and
● 11 percent will get it for more than five years.
Nearly a quarter of retirees will rely on informal
care provided by family members at home for at least two years.
Projections about facility care show that 35 percent of people age 65
will use nursing home care, with 5 percent of 65-year-olds spending more
than five years in nursing facilities.
Spending on LTC will be substantial, with much of
it the private responsibility of families.
The amount of money in today's dollars that would
have to be set aside and invested at age 65 to cover future LTC
expenditures is estimated to be $47,000.
Government programs will cover 53 percent of these
total LTC expenses, but private LTC insurance is projected to cover only
2 percent. Thus, 45 percent of LTC bills will be paid out of pocket.
While on average people would have to invest
$21,000 at age 65 to pay their future LTC bills, individuals will
experience very different futures: half of 65-year-olds will incur no
out-of-pocket costs, yet an investment of $100,000 at age 65 will not be
enough to cover all out-of-pocket LTC costs for 6 percent of retirees.
"It is the wide variation in the projected need for
LTC that poses a challenge for both individuals and policymakers," the
authors wrote.
Although they acknowledge constraints to policy
changes, they discuss options for better spreading the financial risk
through private and public insurance. For instance, Medicaid coverage
could be expanded incrementally through higher financial eligibility
limits or by expanding home and community-based care as benefits.
While the risks to families of having to provide
informal care for extended periods cannot be spread through insurance,
the authors note options for easing the burden of caregiving, such as
insurance with home care benefits to provide family caregivers respite
or supplementary assistance and paying family members for the care they
provide.
"Policy debate typically focuses only on income
security and acute care - and the corresponding Social Security and
Medicare programs," said Peter Kemper, lead author of the study.
"Policymakers should not ignore the third risk that
retirees face - that of needing LTC. Long-term care risk is substantial,
and under current Medicare and Medicaid policy, much of it is the
uninsured private responsibility of individuals who pay for care and of
families who care for their relatives."
INQUIRY, the journal of health care
organization, provision, and financing, is a peer-reviewed scholarly
publication. Now in its 42nd year, it is published quarterly by Excellus
Health Plan, Inc. Press releases and article abstracts are available on
the Inquiry Web site at www.inquiryjournal.org.
Click here to Search SeniorJournal.com for more on
this subject
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |