|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Medicare Drug Program News
Report on Medicare Drug Program 2007 Finds Less
Donut Hole Coverage, Big Premium Jumps in Plans that Do
Families USA says 13 states lack plans covering top
senior meds
November 1, 2006 - In 13 states next year, there
will be no drug plans that offer coverage in the so-called "doughnut
hole," the drug coverage gap in the Medicare Part D prescription drug
program, for the top medicines prescribed to seniors, according to a new
report issued today. In 2006, there were only four such states, but the
number of seniors without access to such doughnut hole coverage will
increase from 375,000 to 6.6 million in 2007 - an 18-fold increase.
In the 37 states and the District of Columbia in
which plans will continue to offer such doughnut hole coverage, premiums
for the lowest-priced Part D plans will increase by 87.4 percent,
jumping from a median monthly price of $55.08 in 2006 to $103.20 in 2007
(an increase in annual premiums from $660.96 to $1,238.40).
The report, issued by the health consumer watchdog
organization Families USA, contradicts the Bush administration's claims
that in 2007 "there will be more plans with coverage in the (doughnut
hole) gap." According to the report, the four states (Alaska, Hawaii,
Maine, and New Hampshire) that did not have plans with meaningful
doughnut hole coverage in 2006 will be joined by nine additional states
(Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, North
Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin) in 2007. (See chart
at right)
In 2006, the doughnut hole coverage gap begins once
a senior has $2,250 in drug costs. When a senior reaches that threshold,
the senior has no coverage until his or her drug costs reach $5,100 - a
gap of $2,850. In 2007, the gap will increase to $3,051, and it is
projected to grow to $5,066 in 2013. While in this coverage gap, seniors
continue to pay Part D premiums. (See chart below story)
| |
Table 2
Medicare Beneficiaries with No
Access to Stand-Alone Drug Plans that Offer Meaningful Coverage
through the Doughnut Hole, by State, 2006 and 2007 |
|
| |
 |
|
"Drug plan coverage in the doughnut hole will be
much scarcer in 2007, and, in those states where such coverage continues
to be available, it will be far more expensive," said Ron Pollack,
Executive Director of Families USA. "This coverage gap never made sense,
and now it is getting worse for seniors who take multiple prescription
drugs."
In seven upper Midwestern and Mountain-West states
(Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and
Wyoming) that will still have Part D plans that provide doughnut hole
coverage for the most commonly prescribed drugs, premiums for the
lowest- priced plans will increase by 185 percent, from $38.70 per month
to $110.30 per month-annual cost increases from $464.40 to $1,323.60.
Beyond the premium hikes in those seven states,
seniors will face steep premium increases in the following states: New
Jersey (179.8 percent), Missouri (111.8 percent), Delaware (95.2
percent), the District of Columbia (95.2 percent), Maryland (95.2
percent), Kansas (88.7 percent), Alabama (84.3 percent), and Tennessee
(84.3 percent).
According to the report, in 2006, there were
approximately 375,000 Medicare beneficiaries in the four states that had
no Part D plan that had doughnut hole coverage for the top medicines
prescribed to seniors. In 2007, with the addition of nine more states,
that number will grow to more than 6.6 million beneficiaries-almost 18
times more than in 2006.
Of the top 25 drugs prescribed to seniors, 18 have
no generic substitute. As a result, the Families USA report focuses on
Part D stand-alone drug plans that provide doughnut hole coverage for
brand-name as well as generic drugs.
The overwhelming majority of
Medicare beneficiaries receiving drug coverage are in the stand- alone
plans because such plans enable seniors to stay in traditional Medicare
so that they can retain their choice of doctors.
(See chart of changes by state below news report.)
Data for the Families USA report were derived from
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In its "Landscape
of Plans," which is available online at
http://www.medicare.gov , CMS identifies all Part D plans that
provide coverage for all formulary drugs in the doughnut hole in 2006
and 2007. In states where more than one such plan was available,
Families USA reported on the plan with the lowest monthly premium for
that year.
Editor's Notes:
For a copy of the report and to review the
methodology, visit
http://www.familiesusa.org .
Families USA is a national organization for health
care consumers. It is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that
advocates for "high-quality, affordable health care for all Americans."
|
Year |
Initial Coverage Limit (Doughnut Hole Begins) |
Catastrophic Threshold (Doughnut Hole Ends) |
Overall Coverage Gap (Size of Doughnut Hole) |
|
2006 |
$2,250 |
$5,100 |
$2,850 |
|
2007 |
$2,400 |
$5,451 |
$3,051 |
|
2013* |
$4,000 |
$9,066 |
$5,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources:
2006 and 2007 data are from the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS), Office of the Actuary, Medicare
Part D Benefit Parameters for Standard Benefit: Annual
Adjustments for 2007 (Washington: CMS, May 22, 2006),
available online at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/downloads/2007_Part_D_Parameter_Update.pdf.
2013 projection by the Congressional Budget Office, A
Detailed Description of CBOs Cost Estimate for the
Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (Washington:
Congressional Budget Office, July 2004), p. 9.
*Projection. |
|
Table 3
Lowest Monthly Premiums for Stand-Alone Drug Plans with
Meaningful Coverage through the Doughnut Hole, by State,
2006 and 2007 |
|
State |
Lowest Monthly Premium 2006 |
Lowest Monthly Premium 2007 |
Percent Increase 2006 to 2007 |
|
Alabama |
$67.16 |
$123.80 |
84.3% |
|
Alaska |
No Plan |
No Plan |
- |
|
Arizona |
$53.54 |
$78.10 |
45.9% |
|
Arkansas |
$58.97 |
$93.20 |
58.0% |
|
California |
$50.91 |
$74.80 |
46.9% |
|
Colorado |
$54.89 |
$73.00 |
33.0% |
|
Connecticut |
$55.08 |
No Plan |
- |
|
Delaware |
$52.88 |
$103.20 |
95.2% |
|
District of Columbia |
$52.88 |
$103.20 |
95.2% |
|
Florida |
$61.70 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Georgia |
$73.17 |
$96.40 |
31.7% |
|
Hawaii |
No Plan |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Idaho |
$52.08 |
$73.50 |
41.1% |
|
Illinois |
$61.51 |
$106.00 |
72.3% |
|
Indiana |
$66.89 |
$108.30 |
61.9% |
|
Iowa |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Kansas |
$54.20 |
$102.30 |
88.7% |
|
Kentucky |
$66.89 |
$108.30 |
61.9% |
|
Louisiana |
$69.92 |
$110.40 |
57.9% |
|
Maine |
No Plan |
No Plan |
- |
|
Maryland |
$52.88 |
$103.20 |
95.2% |
|
Massachusetts |
$55.08 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Michigan |
$65.15 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Minnesota |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Mississippi |
$62.12 |
$103.00 |
65.8% |
|
Missouri |
$56.43 |
$119.50 |
111.8% |
|
Montana |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Nebraska |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Nevada |
$49.59 |
$84.30 |
70.0% |
|
New Hampshire |
No Plan |
No Plan |
- |
|
New Jersey |
$48.50 |
$135.70 |
179.8% |
|
New Mexico |
$59.77 |
$72.80 |
21.8% |
|
New York |
$47.93 |
No Plan |
|
|
North Carolina |
$65.03 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
North Dakota |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Ohio |
$63.91 |
$95.90 |
50.1% |
|
Oklahoma |
$57.85 |
$96.50 |
66.8% |
|
Oregon |
$51.18 |
$75.00 |
46.5% |
|
Pennsylvania |
$58.46 |
$104.50 |
78.8% |
|
Rhode Island |
$55.08 |
No Plan |
|
|
South Carolina |
$68.74 |
$104.20 |
51.6% |
|
South Dakota |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Tennessee |
$67.16 |
$123.80 |
84.3% |
|
Texas |
$58.69 |
$96.50 |
64.4% |
|
Utah |
$52.08 |
$73.50 |
41.1% |
|
Vermont |
$55.08 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Virginia |
$58.18 |
$92.20 |
58.5% |
|
Washington |
$51.18 |
$75.00 |
46.5% |
|
West Virginia |
$58.46 |
$104.50 |
78.8% |
|
Wisconsin |
$57.21 |
No Plan |
-- |
|
Wyoming |
$38.70 |
$110.30 |
185.0% |
|
Median U.S. Premium |
$55.08 |
$103.20 |
|
|
Percent Increase in Median U.S. Premium |
87.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
Landscape of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans
source file, 2006 and 2007, available online at
www.medicare.gov. |
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |