SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

  General Features

  Find Help

  SENIOR ALERTS

  Baby Boomers

  Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

  Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

Get Instant Supplemental Medicare Insurance Quotes.

• Go to more on Medicare Drug Program or Medicare More Senior News on the Front Page

Find the Best Medicare Advantage Plans for Seniors

 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Medicare Drug Program News

Detailed Explanation on Correcting Newest Medicare Billing Errors Due Tomorrow

Two Senators want to know how Medicare and Social Security are going to correct latest snafu impacting up to 500,000 senior citizens

September 18, 2006 – While Medicare and Social Security are still wrestling to recover $50 million that was mistakenly paid to senior citizens as refunds of their Part D drug program premiums, the agencies have been hit with another controversy over additional errors that have been made in billing seniors for their premiums. Two powerful Senators have asked for a detailed explanation by tomorrow.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Medicare Tells Seniors What to Do with Payments Mistakenly Sent by Agency

Some may have to arrange bank transfers or get repayment plans

August 29, 2006 – If you are one of the 230,000 senior citizens that received a check to reimburse you for your Medicare prescription drug plan premiums, you have probably heard you should not cash the check. It was a $50 million mistake by Medicare. The agency is, however, sending you a letter telling you what to do with the check. Unfortunately, most of the checks were direct deposited to the seniors bank account and these people will have to call Medicare to arrange a transfer from their bank, or work out a repayment plan. KaiserNet.org also reports today that the drug plan "doughnut hole" is growing as a political issue. Read more...

Medicare's Nightmare $50 Million Mistake Draws Senator's, Advocates' Concerns

Medicare says senior citizens must return the check but doesn't say how

August 24, 2006 – The fall-out continues over the mistaken reimbursement by Medicare of $50 million to senior citizens paying for their Medicare drug plan with a deduction for their Social Security check. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, sent a raising concern and several advocacy groups are complaining that this adds further confusion for seniors to an already confusing program. Read more...

Medicare Makes $50 Million Mistake by Refunding Drug Program Premiums

230,000 senior citizens will have to repay the money

August 23, 2006 – The Medicare drug program, already under criticism for being a confusing program for many senior citizens, has just become a lot more confusing for 230,000 already in the program. The government has mistakenly sent these seniors checks totaling about $50 million supposedly reimbursing them for monthly premiums paid this year. The checks come with a letter that says their monthly premiums will no longer be deducted from their Social Security check – also an error. Read more...


Read more on Medicare Drug Program or Medicare

 

The Senators – Gordon H. Smith (R-OR), chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Aging, and John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-WV), ranking member of the subcommittee on Healthcare in the Senate Finance Committee, sent a letter to the two agency heads demanding them to clarify the errors and how they plan to correct them.

The agencies had admitted incorrectly billing seniors and individuals with disabilities for their Medicare prescription drug premiums.

Smith and Rockefeller expressed their concern in a letter for the continued administrative errors that have resulted in seniors living on fixed incomes being saddled with payment of several months' worth of Medicare prescription drug premiums all in a single month.

Many seniors who requested that their Medicare premiums be deducted from their Social Security checks when they enrolled have yet to see a reduction in their checks, according to Smith's office. Consequently, they are not being billed, their premium debt is mounting, and their prescription drug plans are not being paid.

Many seniors who switched to higher-cost prescription drug plans are still having the lower premiums from their original plan withheld. They too face mounting premium debt. In both cases, the debt can be for as much as nine or ten months' worth of premiums.

These premium withholding errors were among several ongoing Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Social Security Administration (SSA) data exchange problems that were highlighted last month when the two agencies provided incorrect prescription drug premium refunds totaling $50 million to 231,000 Medicare participants.

It is estimated the billing errors now under scrutiny involved up to 500,000 Medicare beneficiaries.

“It is unfair to ask seniors to bear the financial burden of correcting a problem that occurred because of administrative difficulties on the part of the government,” wrote Smith and Rockefeller.

“There seems to be greater confusion—not less—between your two agencies regarding what will actually happen to seniors in these circumstances in October and November,” the letter states.

Mark McClellan, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Social Security Commissioner JoAnne Barnhart, met with members of the Finance Committee to discuss these problems. Their conflicting answers on how the problems are to be solved, prompted the demands from the Senators.

"Unfortunately, there seems to be greater confusion—not less—between your two agencies regarding what will actually happen to seniors in these circumstances in October and November," stated the letter from the two Senators.

"Commissioner Barnhart, you indicated that these seniors will indeed be subjected to a lump-sum withhold during a single check for these outstanding premiums.

"Dr. McClellan, you suggested that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will not direct the Social Security Administration to withhold more than three months’ worth of outstanding premiums in one check. Instead, you suggested that seniors with outstanding balances of more than three months will be enrolled in direct bill and given the option to repay outstanding balances incrementally.

"Even a three month withhold in a single check could cause severe hardship for seniors living on fixed incomes. Given that these two responses are inconsistent, we are requesting that you provide written clarification of your agencies’ plans for assisting seniors who are facing such unexpected financial commitments."

The letter to McClellan and Barnhart is below.

September 11, 2006

Dr. Mark McClellan, Administrator
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20201

Commissioner JoAnne Barnhart
Social Security Administration
8401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235

Dear Dr. McClellan and Commissioner Barnhart:

We are writing to follow-up on last week’s Finance Committee Members’ meeting to discuss concerns related to withholding prescription drug premiums from Medicare beneficiaries’ Social Security checks. While this meeting was informative, and we are pleased to know that you are working to resolve most of the premium withholding problems, there is an outstanding issue of significant consequence that requires prompt resolution.

We specifically request that you provide us with a detailed response regarding your agencies’ plans for handling the premium withholds of seniors and individuals with disabilities who, by no fault of their own, have several months of outstanding premium underpayments.

As you both mentioned in the meeting, there are four main premium withhold issues that have been encountered by your agencies: 1) premium withholding not being stopped even though seniors have changed to direct bill; 2) premiums not being withheld even though seniors have requested such withholdings; 3) seniors who switch plans and still have premiums from their original plans withheld and not the premium amount for their new plans; and 4) the Part B premium not being withheld accurately.

We are particularly concerned about seniors who requested premium withholding, but have not seen a reduction in their Social Security checks since they enrolled, and those who switched to higher-cost prescription drug plans, but still have their original plan’s premiums withheld.

In many cases, these premium errors have persisted for several months, and in some cases as long as nine or ten months.

We are extremely worried that, as you continue the corrections process for the August/September claims processing period, seniors in these circumstances will face a premium withholding amount equal to several months’ premiums all in one month. A lump-sum withhold such as this could severely harm those seniors who struggle to make ends meet on a fixed income.

The highest prescription drug premiums in each of our states are significant, especially for seniors living on a fixed income. In West Virginia and Oregon, the highest premiums are approximately $70 and $60 per month, respectively.

As you are aware, some seniors switched to these higher-cost plans in order to receive coverage during the doughnut hole. The difference in monthly premium amounts between the original plan and the higher-cost second plan could be as high as $40-$60 per month.

Consequently, we have seniors in our states who may face premium withhold amounts as high as $240-$480. Even more troubling is the imminent withhold of several months’ premiums for those seniors who have not changed plans, but as a result of processing delays, have yet to have any premiums withheld from their checks.

We had hoped that a resolution to these two problems would have been offered at Thursday’s meeting.

Unfortunately, there seems to be greater confusion—not less—between your two agencies regarding what will actually happen to seniors in these circumstances in October and November.

Commissioner Barnhart, you indicated that these seniors will indeed be subjected to a lump-sum withhold during a single check for these outstanding premiums.

Dr. McClellan, you suggested that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will not direct the Social Security Administration to withhold more than three months’ worth of outstanding premiums in one check. Instead, you suggested that seniors with outstanding balances of more than three months will be enrolled in direct bill and given the option to repay outstanding balances incrementally.

Even a three month withhold in a single check could cause severe hardship for seniors living on fixed incomes. Given that these two responses are inconsistent, we are requesting that you provide written clarification of your agencies’ plans for assisting seniors who are facing such unexpected financial commitments.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this request and ask that you respond no later than Tuesday, September 19. It is unfair to ask seniors to bear the financial burden of correcting a problem that occurred because of administrative difficulties on the part of the government. We know that you share our interest in resolving this matter quickly, and we look forward to your timely response.

Sincerely,

(This letter was signed by Senate Committee on Aging Chairman Gordon H. Smith (R-OR) and Senator John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-WV) Ranking member of the Senate Finance Committees subcommittee on Healthcare.)

 

 

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.co

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com