SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

Get Instant Supplemental Medicare Insurance Quotes.

• Go to more on Medicare Drug Program News or More Senior News on the Front Page

Find the Best Medicare Advantage Plans for Seniors

E-mail this page to a friend!

Medicare Drug Program News

Medicare Drug Plan Call Centers Slammed by GAO for Poor Service

Senior citizens probably did not get right information 66% of the time

July 10, 2006 – The call center service provided by Medicare prescription drug plans received light praise and heavy criticism today from the Government Accountability Office based on their test of responses from the call centers. GAO found the CSRs "prompt and courteous" and with "helpful suggestions." The problem was they "did not consistently provide accurate and complete responses." They failed to give the right information 66 percent of the time.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Medicare Says Drug Plans are Negotiating 'Large Discounts' for Seniors

CMS disagrees with Democrats who want government to be negotiators

July 3, 2006 – As an answer to demands by Democrats in Congress that Medicare be allowed to negotiate better drug prices and complaints by consumer groups that drug plan prices are increasing rapidly, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has released a study showing the private drug plans are negotiating "large discounts" for Medicare beneficiaries that "have increased over time." The study also says only 8 percent those in the drug program will be effected by the "doughnut hole" coverage gap. Read more...

Medicare Reveals Steps Taken to Improve Service by Drug Plans

Detailed data shows improvements in call center wait times

June 30, 2006- Since January, Medicare has taken more than 1,000 compliance actions to improve prescription drug plan service to beneficiaries, and in most cases, these actions have resulted in timely responses by the drug plans, according to the details of actions taken by Medicare released yesterday. Read more...


Read more Medicare Drug Program News

 

The GAO obtained accurate and complete responses to about one-third of the 864 calls for which GAO reached a CSR at 10 of the largest PDP sponsor call centers. The GAO asked five questions, which GAO developed using information from CMS and other sources.

The overall accuracy and completeness rate for each call center ranged from 20 to 60 percent. CSRs were unable to answer 15 percent of the questions posed, primarily those related to plan costs.

 
 

Furthermore, CSRs within the same call center sometimes provided inconsistent answers. For example, in response to questions about PDP cost comparisons for specified sets of drugs, CSRs at three call centers told GAO that it was against the sponsors’ policies to identify any of their plans as lowest cost. However, other CSRs at each of these call centers did not cite this policy and did identify a plan as lowest cost.

Other highlights of the critique:

  ● GAO found that in most instances, drug plan providers were unable to give accurate information in response to simple questions about plan costs, low-income coverage, plan formulary procedures, and plan utilization management techniques. Specifically, GAO found:

  ● Two-thirds of phone calls to provider hotlines were not answered completely or accurately. The phone centers operated by private Medicare providers gave inaccurate or incomplete answers during 66% of calls. Two Medicare plan providers gave inaccurate or incomplete information at least 75% of the time.

  ● Medicare drug plan providers were unable to provide critical cost information for seniors to choose among plans. Two GAO questions focused on which of drug plans would provide seniors with the lowest out-of-pocket costs, and what these costs would be. Medicare providers failed to give accurate or complete answers over 70% of the time. In one case, the plan sponsor hotline underestimated the actual costs by $6,000.

  ● Low-income beneficiaries often received inaccurate information. One question asked which plans offered by the provider were available to low-income beneficiaries with no premium. This question was answered incorrectly or inaccurately 66% of the time. This is particularly troubling since this information was also incorrect in the 2006 Medicare & You handbook mailed to all Medicare beneficiaries.

  ● Medicare plans often provided conflicting answers, giving one answer on one call and a different answer on a second call. For example, some plans said that one of their plans was the least expensive on one call and then said that a completely different plan was the least expensive on a separate call.

  ● GAO did reach a representative in less than 1 minute for 46 percent of the calls CSRs fielded and in less than 5 minutes for 96 percent of the calls fielded.

  ● While GAO did not reach CSRs for 4 percent of the calls it placed, mainly because of disconnections.

  ● GAO found that 98 percent of CSRs with whom GAO spoke were easy to understand, polite, and professional. In addition, many CSRs provided helpful suggestions related to GAO’s questions, such as details about a mail-order option to obtain drugs or lower-cost drugs.

In commenting on a draft of this report, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criticized the analysis as based on inaccurate, incomplete, and subjective methods that limit the report’s relevance and validity. GAO maintains that its methods are sound and its findings are accurate. CMS officials told GAO at a May 2006 meeting that CSRs should have been able to accurately answer the questions GAO posed.

Democrats were quick to release the report. Rep. Henry A. Waxman, Rep. John D. Dingell was joined by Rep. Charles B. Rangel, Rep. Pete Stark, and Rep. Sherrod Brown in pointing out the private plans that are responsible for running the new Medicare drug benefit "did not consistently provide callers with accurate and complete information."

"The poor quality of the information is inexcusable," said Waxman, Ranking Member of the Committee on Government Reform. "Seniors with basic questions about the Medicare drug benefit are being left in the dark. Even if they call the plans directly, they can't get accurate answers."

"The lack of accurate and understandable information for our seniors has been a chronic problem since the beginning of Medicare Part D," said Rep. Dingell, Ranking Member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. "Senior citizens are being hurt by the indifference and incompetence of the Bush Administration and its friends in the insurance industry."

This is the second GAO report analyzing the drug plan information available to Medicare beneficiaries. In May 2006, GAO analyzed the information provided to seniors by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, concluding that this information was frequently confusing, inaccurate, or incomplete. The new GAO findings show that the private plans are also failing to answer seniors' questions, leaving millions of seniors unable to get accurate answers to their questions about the Medicare drug plans.

About this report:

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) established a voluntary outpatient prescription drug benefit, known as Medicare Part D. Private sponsors have contracted with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to provide this benefit and are offering over 1,400 stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDP). Depending on where they live, beneficiaries typically have a choice of 40 to 50 PDPs, which vary in cost and coverage.

MMA required each PDP sponsor to staff a toll-free call center, which serves as a key source of the information that beneficiaries need to make informed choices among PDPs.

GAO examined (1) whether PDP sponsors provide prompt, courteous, and helpful service to Medicare beneficiaries and others and (2) the extent to which PDP sponsor call centers provide accurate and complete information to Medicare beneficiaries and other callers.

To address these objectives, GAO made 900 calls to 10 of the largest PDP sponsor call centers during March 2006, posing one of five questions about their Part D plans during each call. GAO tracked the amount of time it took to reach a customer service representative (CSR), the number of calls that did not reach a CSR, and the appropriateness and clarity of CSRs’ language. GAO developed criteria for determining accurate and complete responses based on CMS information.

Links to the report:

Medicare Part D: Prescription Drug Plan Sponsor Call Center Responses Were Prompt, but Not Always Accurate GAO-06-710, June 30, 2006
Abstract   Highlights-PDF   PDF

 

 

 

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com