SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

 • Social Security Reform

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Medicare Drug Program or Medicare More Senior News on the Front Page

 

Click here to vitamins without a pill.


 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Medicare Drug Program News

Senior Citizens on a Rollercoaster with Medicare Drug Plan Pricing

Consumer Union finds over a quarter of sample increased drug cost after seniors were 'locked in'

March 2, 2007 - A new report from Consumers Union - Seniors in Medicare Part D on Cost Rollercoaster - finds that it may be difficult – if not impossible – for Medicare beneficiaries to have confidence that their private Part D insurance plan will not change or increase prescription drug costs for the year they are locked into the plan.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Rep. Waxman Investigates Profits of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans

Wants to know if plans pass negotiated savings on to beneficiaries

Feb. 12, 2007

Negotiating Medicare Drug Prices Hits Obstacles: CBO Sees No Savings, GOP Senators to Filibuster

Most news is bad news for proponents of bargaining for drugs

January 11, 2007

Where Senior Citizens Live Makes Difference in Medicare Drug Cost

Some seniors may pay thousands of dollars more for medicines than others buying same drugs in other states

January 10, 2007

Administration Says Medicare Drug Program Cost Drop Shows No Need to Negotiate on Drugs

Most antifraud complain reports by prescription drug plans are missing at CMS

January 8, 2007


Read the latest news
> Medicare
>
Medicare Drug Program
> Today's Senior Headlines

 

Consumers Union found that 28 percent of the private insurance plans it tracked in five zip codes across the country increased their costs for a group of selected drugs by 5 percent or more in 2006. Some cost increases were dramatic – one Florida plan increased its costs for the selected drugs by nearly one-third, or $795, for the year.

Beneficiaries also might be in for a shock in 2007. During the one-month period from January to February 2007 – right after beneficiaries locked into a plan for the calendar year – 95 percent of the sampled plans increased their costs by some degree for the package of five widely used prescription drugs. Of those, 21 percent hiked costs by 5 percent or more in that one-month period.

“Seniors likely expected their Medicare drug insurance plan would have predictable costs, but our sample shows some dramatic increases,” said Bill Vaughan, senior policy analyst for Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports. “What’s most disappointing is we found costs going up just one month after beneficiaries locked into a plan for 2007.”

“The whole point of having Medicare drug insurance is to protect against the unexpected, and we’re finding a lot of unexpected cost increases,” Vaughan added. “Each time drug costs go up under these plans, seniors are pushed that much closer to the brink of the doughnut hole coverage gap.”

 

See background and recommendations below news report.

 

Vaughan said the cost increases underscore the need for Congress to require drug price negotiation to get the best deal for seniors, as well as offer a consistently priced, Medicare-administered drug plan in addition to the private plans.

“Seniors and taxpayers deserve a Medicare drug insurance plan that has the best possible prices, and is consistent throughout the year,” Vaughan said.

Since December 2005, Consumers Union has used the Medicare.gov Web site to track plan costs for five widely used drugs offered by Part D insurance plans in five zip codes in New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois and California. The monitoring has found dramatic fluctuations in plans throughout the year.

More than three-fourths (78 percent) of the plans changed their costs for the selected drugs three or more times during 2006. Thirty percent of the plans changed their costs at least six out of the 12 months. For the one-month period of January to February 2007, only three of the surveyed plans listed the same cost.

Costs for some plans also jumped around wildly on the Medicare.gov site.

For example, in November 2006, the SilverScript Plus plan offered in California was priced at $2,859 annually for the sampled drugs. On Jan. 5, 2007, the same plan was listed at $5,418. Five days later, on Jan. 10, the price changed again, to $3,313.

CU supports a price-negotiated, Medicare-administered drug plan that will offer stable, consistent drug costs and coverage to seniors. In the meantime, Consumers Union is urging CMS to warn consumers that some plans increase prices significantly during the year, and said the agency should make public the names of plans that frequently change the cost of commonly used drugs.

Beneficiaries who select a plan based on the Web site information, and have proof of that listing, also should be able to change plans anytime during the following year when the plan has increased drug costs by more than 5 percent.

Since many beneficiaries likely do not review the cost details of their plan during the Open Enrollment season, plans which increase the cost of drugs by more than 5 percent from one year to the next should be required to notify enrollees who are taking those specific drugs.

“The Medicare drug cost information has to be accurate, timely and consistent so consumers can make informed decisions when picking a plan,” Vaughan said. “Once seniors pick a plan they are locked in for a year, so the information they base their decision on better be accurate.”

For a copy of the full report, click here.

Background and Recommendations from Consumers Union

Medicare Part D – Background

In approving the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Congress allowed private insurance companies to offer prescription drug coverage through the Medicare program.

The law prohibits CMS – which administers the rest of Medicare’s health benefits – from offering its own Part D prescription drug coverage. The law also prohibits CMS from negotiating with drug companies to offer lower drug costs through the plans, like the Department of Veterans Affairs does.

More than 1,400 plans were offered in 2006, and over 1,800 plans are offered in 2007. In most states, beneficiaries have a choice of at least 50 stand-alone plans.

Because of the wide variety of plans, coverage and costs, CMS created a Website to enable beneficiaries to comparison shop for plans. Beneficiaries are urged to list the prescription medicines they take or are anticipated to take, and compare plans on the drugs they cover and their expected total drug costs. Information on plan costs, coverage and drug costs is supplied to the CMS Web site by the plans themselves.

Shopping for a prescription drug plan is critical, because once a beneficiary enrolls in a plan, he or she cannot switch plans for a 12-month period.

Clear and consistent pricing of drugs offered under a plan is what beneficiaries should expect – yet the law does not require such. In fact, a plan may change the costs they charge for prescriptions during the year period without notice.

They also may drop coverage of drugs with 60-day notice. Meanwhile, in most cases beneficiaries are allowed to change plans only once a year, during a six-week open enrollment period from November 15 to December 31.

 

Recommendations

Consumers Union recommends that Congress amend the law to allow beneficiaries the option of joining a new, Medicare-administered drug plan that provides a stable, comprehensive drug formulary with consistent costs.

The law should require Medicare to negotiate directly with drug manufacturers to get better drug prices, just like the Department of Veterans Affairs does.

In the meantime, Consumers Union recommends immediate action, including:

  ● Through mailings and the media, CMS should warn consumers that some plans increase drug costs significantly during the year. As part of an effort to secure price stability, CMS should make public the names of plans that frequently change the price of commonly used drugs or increase prices significantly. To set an example, CMS should refuse to renew the contract of plans that advertise one set of costs in the Open Enrollment period and then raise costs significantly during the year.

  ● Beneficiaries who select a plan based on the www.medicare.gov website listings, and have proof of that listing (e.g., by printing a copy), should be able to change plans anytime during the following year when the plan increases costs of the drugs the beneficiary selected by more than 5 percent.

  ● Plans change the cost of drugs significantly from one year to another. Since we believe many beneficiaries do not review the cost details of their plan during the Open Enrollment season, plans which significantly increase (by more than 5 percent) the cost of drugs from one year to the next should be required to notify enrollees who are taking those specific drugs that are significantly higher in cost.

  ● CMS needs to improve its quality rating of the plans. The current ‘star’ rating system makes plans appear too similar and hides important quality differences. Plans should be graded so consumers can select the highest quality plans (and avoid poorly performing plans). The quality information should be made available in October 2007, before the start of the next open enrollment season.

 

>> Click here for the full report in pdf

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.co

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com