Senior Citizens on a Rollercoaster with Medicare
Drug Plan Pricing
Consumer Union finds over a quarter of sample
increased drug cost after seniors were 'locked in'
March
2, 2007 - A new report from Consumers Union - Seniors in Medicare
Part D on Cost Rollercoaster - finds that it may be difficult if
not impossible for Medicare beneficiaries to have confidence that
their private Part D insurance plan will not change or increase
prescription drug costs for the year they are locked into the plan.
Consumers Union found that 28 percent of the
private insurance plans it tracked in five zip codes across the country
increased their costs for a group of selected drugs by 5 percent or more
in 2006. Some cost increases were dramatic one Florida plan increased
its costs for the selected drugs by nearly one-third, or $795, for the
year.
Beneficiaries also might be in for a shock in 2007.
During the one-month period from January to February 2007 right after
beneficiaries locked into a plan for the calendar year 95 percent of
the sampled plans increased their costs by some degree for the package
of five widely used prescription drugs. Of those, 21 percent hiked costs
by
5 percent or more in that one-month period.
Seniors likely expected their Medicare drug
insurance plan would have predictable costs, but our sample shows some
dramatic increases, said Bill Vaughan, senior policy analyst for
Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports. Whats most
disappointing is we found costs going up just one month after
beneficiaries locked into a plan for 2007.
The whole point of having Medicare drug insurance
is to protect against the unexpected, and were finding a lot of
unexpected cost increases, Vaughan added. Each time drug costs go up
under these plans, seniors are pushed that much closer to the brink of
the doughnut hole coverage gap.
| |
See background
and recommendations below news report. |
|
Vaughan said the cost increases underscore the need
for Congress to require drug price negotiation to get the best deal for
seniors, as well as offer a consistently priced, Medicare-administered
drug plan in addition to the private plans.
Seniors and taxpayers deserve a Medicare drug
insurance plan that has the best possible prices, and is consistent
throughout the year, Vaughan said.
Since December 2005, Consumers Union has used the
Medicare.gov Web site to track plan costs for five widely used drugs
offered by Part D insurance plans in five zip codes in New York,
Florida, Texas, Illinois and California. The monitoring has found
dramatic fluctuations in plans throughout the year.
More than three-fourths (78 percent) of the plans
changed their costs for the selected drugs three or more times during
2006. Thirty percent of the plans changed their costs at least six out
of the 12 months. For the one-month period of January to February 2007,
only three of the surveyed plans listed the same cost.
Costs for some plans also jumped around wildly on
the Medicare.gov site.
For example, in November 2006, the SilverScript
Plus plan offered in California was priced at $2,859 annually for the
sampled drugs. On Jan. 5, 2007, the same plan was listed at $5,418. Five
days later, on Jan. 10, the price changed again, to $3,313.
CU supports a price-negotiated,
Medicare-administered drug plan that will offer stable, consistent drug
costs and coverage to seniors. In the meantime, Consumers Union is
urging CMS to warn consumers that some plans increase prices
significantly during the year, and said the agency should make public
the names of plans that frequently change the cost of commonly used
drugs.
Beneficiaries who select a plan based on the Web
site information, and have proof of that listing, also should be able to
change plans anytime during the following year when the plan has
increased drug costs by more than 5 percent.
Since many beneficiaries likely do not review the
cost details of their plan during the Open Enrollment season, plans
which increase the cost of drugs by more than 5 percent from one year to
the next should be required to notify enrollees who are taking those
specific drugs.
The Medicare drug cost information has to be
accurate, timely and consistent so consumers can make informed decisions
when picking a plan, Vaughan said. Once seniors pick a plan they are
locked in for a year, so the information they base their decision on
better be accurate.
For a copy of the full report,
click here.
|
Background and Recommendations from
Consumers Union |
|
Medicare Part D Background
In approving the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,
and Modernization Act of 2003, Congress allowed private insurance
companies to offer prescription drug coverage through the Medicare
program.
The law prohibits CMS which administers the rest of
Medicares health benefits from offering its own Part D prescription
drug coverage. The law also prohibits CMS from negotiating with drug
companies to offer lower drug costs through the plans, like the
Department of Veterans Affairs does.
More than 1,400 plans were offered in 2006, and over
1,800 plans are offered in 2007. In most states, beneficiaries have a
choice of at least 50 stand-alone plans.
Because of the wide variety of
plans, coverage and costs, CMS created a Website to enable beneficiaries
to comparison shop for plans. Beneficiaries are urged to list the
prescription medicines they take or are anticipated to take, and compare
plans on the drugs they cover and their expected total drug costs.
Information on plan costs, coverage and drug costs is supplied to the
CMS Web site by the plans themselves.
Shopping for a prescription drug plan is critical,
because once a beneficiary enrolls in a plan, he or she cannot switch
plans for a 12-month period.
Clear and consistent pricing of drugs
offered under a plan is what beneficiaries should expect yet the law
does not require such. In fact, a plan may change the costs they charge
for prescriptions during the year period without notice.
They also may
drop coverage of drugs with 60-day notice. Meanwhile, in most cases
beneficiaries are allowed to change plans only once a year, during a
six-week open enrollment period from November 15 to December 31.
|
|
Recommendations
Consumers Union recommends that Congress amend the law to
allow beneficiaries the option of joining a new, Medicare-administered
drug plan that provides a stable, comprehensive drug formulary with
consistent costs.
The law should require Medicare to negotiate directly
with drug manufacturers to get better drug prices, just like the
Department of Veterans Affairs does.
In the meantime, Consumers Union recommends immediate
action, including:
● Through mailings and the media, CMS should warn
consumers that some plans increase drug costs significantly during the
year. As part of an effort to secure price stability, CMS should make
public the names of plans that frequently change the price of commonly
used drugs or increase prices significantly. To set an example, CMS
should refuse to renew the contract of plans that advertise one set of
costs in the Open Enrollment period and then raise costs significantly
during the year.
● Beneficiaries who select a plan based on the
www.medicare.gov website listings, and have proof of that listing (e.g.,
by printing a copy), should be able to change plans anytime during the
following year when the plan increases costs of the drugs the
beneficiary selected by more than 5 percent.
● Plans change the cost of drugs significantly from one
year to another. Since we believe many beneficiaries do not review the
cost details of their plan during the Open Enrollment season, plans
which significantly increase (by more than 5 percent) the cost of drugs
from one year to the next should be required to notify enrollees who are
taking those specific drugs that are significantly higher in cost.
● CMS needs to improve its quality rating of the plans.
The current star rating system makes plans appear too similar and
hides important quality differences. Plans should be graded so consumers
can select the highest quality plans (and avoid poorly performing
plans). The quality information should be made available in October
2007, before the start of the next open enrollment season.
|
>>
Click here for the full report in pdf