SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

 • Social Security Reform

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Medicare or Opinions or More Senior News on the Front Page

 

Click here to vitamins without a pill.


 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Opinion: Medicare

Drum Beat to Reduce Medicare Costs May Endanger Some Senior Citizens

Study says switching some from ICDs to AEDs could save money to help more seniors but it may also be way to just save money

By Tucker Sutherland, editor

 

"…it might be reasonable for Medicare to provide the less expensive defibrillator to many more Medicare beneficiaries." - Peter Cram, M.D.

 

June 19, 2006 – The growth of Medicare costs is undoubtedly the largest financial challenge facing the U.S. and a research team suggests the program can save millions by making tougher judgments on which senior citizens get implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and which must settle for the less expensive, less reliable automated external defibrillators (AEDs). The thrust of the study, however, is not on reducing Medicare's cost, but on freeing up money to provide help to more seniors.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Lots of Talk but Little Action on Changes to Medicare

Washington Times explores problems elderly have with medication

June 14, 2006 – There are a number of ideas for making changes to Medicare kicking around Washington, but KaiserNet.org says Congressional leaders are sending "mixed signals" about the possibility of action any time soon. The daily report by Kaiser also looks at a report in the Washington Times on how elderly patients often experience problems with dosages and improper combinations of medications. Read more...

Guest Opinion

New Drugs: The Choice We Face

'The real problem with drug development is not the loudly proclaimed drug safety but the growing shortage of newer, more effective medicines'

By Robert Goldberg

June 5, 2006 - More and more Americans suffer from Alzheimer’s disease either as victims or caregivers. So when a vaccine was developed that may actually reverse this terrible, degenerative process, you would think it would be welcomed and fast-tracked through the federal bureaucracy. Think again. Read more...

Guest Opinion

Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Not in the Best Interest of the Seniors

'after learning the facts, I've lost both my trust and my faith in AARP'

Jewel Littenberg - Senior Advocate

June 3, 2006 - I found it hard to believe that some of the problems that were generated by the Medicare Prescription Drug plan were not realized at the time our legislators were preparing it. To have created a benefit plan that even PhD's have a hard time figuring out, somehow just didn't make sense. Read more...


Read more on Medicare

or Opinions

 

To put this study in it best light, the news release says, "Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure could benefit from new strategies to decide who qualifies for lifesaving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), according to a University of Iowa study."

The commendable approach the researchers take is that shifting some seniors to the cheaper AEDs will free up Medicare money to provide more defibrillators for more seniors who need them.

But, clearly there is a strong underlying message – probably unintended, since they do not suggest Medicare reduce spending - that this strategy can also be used to serve the same number of seniors and save substantial money. All Medicare has to do is stiffen the requirements of ICDs and give the non-qualifiers AEDs.

"ICDs are very expensive and very effective. AEDs are less expensive but not nearly as effective. But for the same total expenditure, it might be reasonable for Medicare to provide the less expensive defibrillator to many more Medicare beneficiaries," said Peter Cram, M.D., the study's lead author and assistant professor of internal medicine in the UI Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine.

"Medicare is facing a budget crunch. The U.S. population is aging. Budgets are tight. Medicare needs to be innovative and think carefully about how to maximize the value it provides to American seniors," Cram added.

The U.S. Medicare Program spends about $4.6 billion dollars each year providing ICDs to older Americans. The investigation, published in the June 16 online early issue of the journal Value in Health, explored what would happen if Medicare spent the same amount of money to provide more patients with less expensive, yet also less effective, automated external defibrillators (AEDs).

An ICD is a small, pager-sized device implanted beneath the skin that uses electric shock to restore normal heart rhythm and costs about $40,000. An AED is a briefcase-sized device that requires a bystander to use pads that deliver an electric shock to restore the victim's heart rhythm and costs about $2,000.

The research team chose to focus on ICDs because they are both expensive and in high demand for patients enrolled in Medicare. The devices are commonly given to patients whose heart is pumping at less than 30 percent of capacity.

The nearly $4.6 billion Medicare spends annually on implantable defibrillators benefits approximately 40,000 patients. However, the investigators suggested that if Medicare shifted some of this money from purchasing ICDs to purchasing the less expensive AEDs, then thousands of additional patients might benefit.

The study used computer simulations to analyze three scenarios involving hypothetical Medicare patients: patients receiving ICDs, patients receiving AEDS for in-home use, and patients relying on emergency rescue services.

An ICD costs on average $40,000, including implantation. With checkups and device upkeep, the average cost rises to about $115,000 per patient. An AED costs about $2,000, so with accompanying care, the AED cost is about $5,500 for each patient, the study says.

"Medicare could potentially assign patients to get either an ICD or AED based upon the patient's level of risk for heart problems," Cram said. "This would ensure that the maximum number of patients benefit while preserving the Medicare budget."

Cram noted the study has several limitations, including the assumption that AEDs would be given only to patients who live with others capable of administering the device.

Possibly Dr. Cram and his associates have a good idea that will help more senior citizens live longer, healthier lives. This is certainly a goal we applaud. Our concern is that such studies be used to put a price tag on the value of an older person's life and the government begins to trim the Medicare budget by assigning seniors to less expensive but more risky treatments.

But, maybe that is inevitable, if healthcare costs continue to shoot upward.

Seniors can expect studies at least suggesting ways that Medicare benefits can be trimmed are managed with greater emphasis on cost containment.

Notes on the study:

In addition to Cram, the study team included David Katz, M.D., UI associate professor of internal medicine and epidemiology, and investigators from the Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Field Program, the University of Michigan School of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Public Health and the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts-New England Medical Center in Boston.

Cram is supported by a Career Development Award from the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health.

The research article also will appear in volume 9, issue 5, of the print issue of Value in Health, the official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research and help health care leaders to make decisions that are solidly evidence-based. The journal is published bi-monthly and has a regular readership of over 3,000 clinicians, decision-makers and researchers worldwide.

ISPOR is a nonprofit, international organization that strives to translate pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research into practice to ensure that society allocates scarce health care resources wisely, fairly and efficiently. For further information on ISPOR, visit http://www.ispor.org.

University of Iowa Health Care describes the partnership between the UI Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine and UI Hospitals and Clinics and the patient care, medical education and research programs and services they provide. Visit UI Health Care online at http://www.uihealthcare.com.

Nursing Home Abuse, Medical Malpractice? Contact a lawyer. click here

 

 

 

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

     Back to Top

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com