|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Understanding Medicaid
Medicaid - Cost and complexity tax reform efforts
By Pamela M. Prah, Stateline.org
Staff Writer
March
6, 2005 - When
Medicaid first came into being in mid-1965, the now gigantic government
health care program went largely unnoticed. The federal-state policy
commitment to provide for the medical needs of the poor was so
overshadowed by passage of sweeping Medicare health care guarantees for
every American over age 65 that President Lyndon B. Johnson gave
Medicaid only passing mention at an Independence, Mo., bill-signing
ceremony.
|
Related Story |
|
|
New York Medicaid Changes Praised by HHS Secretary:
May Be Signal to Governors
March 17, 2005 The effort in New York to
modernize the Medicaid program drew praise yesterday from Health and
Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt. It may signal a direction for the
states to move, after appeals to President Bush by the governors failed
to produce additional federal funding.
Read more...
|
|
Forty years later, Medicaid has evolved into a
policy nightmare whose ever-growing costs overburden the federal
treasury and threaten to swamp state budgets. At a February meeting of
the National Governors Association in Washington, D.C., it was the
dominant issue, sparking much discussion of possible budget cuts and
proposed reforms.
But like so many policy debates these days, many
well-informed people probably found the discussion incoherent; the
governors and federal officials used often-confusing, ever-changing
frames of reference in talking about the program. As Pennsylvania's
Democratic Gov. Edward Rendell observed resignedly in a hallway
conversation, Medicaid is so complicated its hard to explain.
In hopes of bringing some light to this important
discussion, Stateline.org set out to better define the Medicaid program
and point you to resources that might give you a greater understanding
of what the politicians are talking about. You?ll find a great deal of
basic information on a web site maintained by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services; click on
Medicaid. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation offers help at
Kaiser/Medicaid and
Kaiser Report . The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government
has compiled still more information at
Rockefeller research.
|
Nursing Home Abuse, Medical Malpractice? Contact a lawyer.
click here
|
Stateline.org will list other helpful sites as we
find them. This "Backgrounder" is a work in progress and will be updated
as warranted. Here are some facts at a glance in FAQ form:
What is Medicaid?
In reality, Medicaid is not one program, but 50
different programs that states administer using broad federal guidelines
and federal funds. Washington picks up about half of the tab, states pay
the other half. In 2005, Medicaid will serve 53 million people -- more
than any other single health care program in America, including
Medicare.
Is Medicaid the same as Medicare?
No. Medicare is a federal program that provides
health care for some 41 million senior citizens and retirees over 65
years of age. Until recently, states had no role in Medicare. Starting
Jan. 1, 2006, Medicare will provide a prescription drug benefit for the
first time, but unlike all other Medicare services, states will partly
pay for this benefit.
Is Medicaid associated with welfare?
No. Almost half (48 percent) of Medicaid recipients
are children. Adults, primarily low-income working parents, make up
nearly a third (27 percent). Disabled Americans make up 16 percent and
the elderly 9 percent, according to the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid
and the Uninsured. The 1996 welfare law no longer links Medicaid to
welfare. Today, most Medicaid beneficiaries are not on welfare, a
striking difference from 20 years ago when three-fourths of people on
Medicaid also received welfare.
Who does Medicaid cover?
The federal government tells states which groups of
people they must cover and the kind of services they must provide.
"Mandatory" groups include:
> Poor pregnant women, low-income, uninsured
children and some parents of low-income families.
> Low-income elderly, blind and disabled people, and
> Certain low-income Medicare recipients.
> States have broad authority to cover other "optional" groups if
they want. In 2004, for example, 40 states covered pregnant women at
income levels that exceed the federal poverty ceiling.
What does Medicaid pay for?
Medicaid pays for a variety of mandatory benefits
in every state including:
> Doctor's visits
> Inpatient hospital services
> Laboratory services and X-rays
> Outpatient hospital services that are preventive,
diagnostic, rehabilitative
> Nursing home care
> Family planning and pregnancy-related services
> Home health care
> Nurse-midwife services
> Periodic screening for children under 21
What are some optional benefits that many state
Medicaid programs cover?
States can -- and often do -- go beyond required
benefits. Among the most popular "optional" services are:
> Prescription drugs
> Dental services
> Eye glasses and hearing aids
> Medical equipment and supplies, such as wheelchairs
> Ambulance services
> Intermediate care for the mentally retarded
> Hospice care
Even though prescription drug coverage and
ambulance transport are listed as optional, all states offer both.
How much does Medicaid cost?
Together, state and federal governments are
expected to spend nearly $330 billion on Medicaid in 2005. Medicaid
accounts for 22 percent of state budgets, when factoring in federal
funds. That's up from just 8 percent in 1985. That means the growth of
Medicaid spending is crowding out funding for other programs that states
deliver, including education, corrections and transportation.
The federal government each year tinkers with its
formula for calculating how much money it gives each state. Generally,
the richer the state, the less it gets. The federal matching rate is
based on states' average per-capita income and is always at least 50
percent, but could be as high as nearly 80 percent. In 2005, 12 states
got the minimum 50 percent rate (California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey,
New York, Virginia and Washington) while 10 states got matching rates
higher than 70 percent (Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia).
Because Medicaid is the biggest source of federal
revenue to the states, even the slightest variation of the federal match
can have a big impact on a state's budget.
The changes for fiscal 2006, for example, will
require that states pony up an additional $527 million, according to the
Federal Funds Information for States (FFIS), a joint subscription
service for NCSL and the National Governors Association that tracks
budget issues affecting states
States hardest hit by this change in matching
formulas include New Mexico, which could lose some $82 million, Alaska
(potentially losing $76 million) and Louisiana (potentially losing $70
million), according to FFIS.
Why are states' Medicaid costs going up?
It was no surprise that Medicaid enrollment went up
in the last few years when the economy took a downturn. As more people
lost their jobs and income, they turned to Medicaid. But the dramatic
and sustained increase has surprised some state budget and health
officials.
Enrollment jumped by one-third from 2000 through
2004. If recent state estimates are on target, enrollment will grow
another 5 percent in 2005, making the rise in overall enrollment for
2000-2005 nearly 40 percent, according to the Kaiser Commission. Higher
enrollment means higher costs for states. Medicaid spending jumped by
more than 50 percent between 2000-2004.
But even as the economy rebounds, Medicaid costs
still are expected to eat up state budgets. Rising health care costs,
particularly prescription drugs, plays a huge role, but so do
demographics. As Americans gets older, many will need more long-term
care and nursing home care. Medicaid already is the nation's primary
long-term care program, accounting for 43 percent of total long-term
care spending and paying for nearly 60 percent of nursing home
residents.
Changes in the U.S. workplace also are a reason for
the spike in Medicaid enrollment. More employers are opting not to
provide health care insurance for their employees, forcing some working
poor to turn to Medicaid. Experts say the Medicaid safety net prevented
the number of uninsured Americans, which recently hit a record 45
million people, from growing substantially higher.
What are states doing to curb Medicaid costs?
While state revenues have been improving, state
budgets still are feeling relentless pressure from Medicaid. States,
which are required to balance their budgets, have tried myriad ways to
cut.
Between 2002 and 2005, all states reduced payments
to health care providers such as doctors and nursing homes and tried
various prescription drug cost controls. Thirty-eight states tightened
eligibility requirements, and 34 cut benefits.
In Tennessee, for example, ballooning medical costs
forced Gov. Phil Bredesen (D) to scale back TennCare, the state's
10-year-old health care program for the poor and uninsured that went
well beyond Medicaid's requirements and covered working families who
couldn't afford private insurance. The state is dropping 323,000 adults
from TennCare's rolls to save the program. Without the cuts, the state
would have had to find an extra $650 million dollars to cover TennCare's
bills in fiscal 2006. Even with cutbacks, the program's price tag is
going up an additional $75 million.
Who are "dual eligibles" and why are states so
upset about them?
In any debate about Medicaid, state officials are
certain to use the term "dual eligible," referring to 7 million elderly
people who are on the rolls of both Medicare and Medicaid. These people
account for more than 40 percent of total Medicaid spending because they
tend to be very poor and frail and have substantial health problems.
States not only pay for their long-term needs and
prescription drugs, but help pick up the tab for their Medicare premiums
and cost-sharing. The states argue that the federal government should
shoulder more of the cost of caring for this group.
What is S-CHIP?
Commonly called "S-CHIP," the State Children's
Health Insurance Program was created in 1997 to expand health insurance
coverage to children in low-income families that did not qualify for
traditional Medicaid but could not afford to pay for private
insurance. It's largely hailed as a successful program, but it also
suffered economic woes during states' budget crises.
What's next for Medicaid?
The nation's governors, the Bush administration and
Congress agree that Medicaid costs are growing at an unsustainable rate,
but there is considerable debate over how best to rein in the growing
costs.
Governors balk at President Bush's bid to save the
federal government $40 billion in part by closing loopholes that states
exploit to get more federal matching funds for Medicaid. Governors
haven't ruled out some of the president's other ideas, such as allowing
states to require co-payments with less federal red tape and restricting
the ability of seniors to transfer assets to qualify for Medicaid's
nursing home coverage.
Another approach that governors believe could be
promising is the president's proposals to provide $4 billion to states
to help low-income people purchase private health insurance along with
$74 billion for health insurance tax credits.
But the governors and the White Houser aren't close
to agreeing on a bipartisan Medicaid fix to present to Capitol Hill,
where lawmakers have shown little interest in restructuring the program.
In the meantime, states are going to try to rework
their Medicaid plans using the current system. Florida and South
Carolina are exploring the idea of giving Medicaid recipients a fixed
amount of money in the form of a voucher or debit card to cover health
care needs.
Vermont has a proposal that it thinks could be a
model for the country. Under the plan, which awaits blessing from
Washington, the federal government would provide less money to the state
and, in exchange, would allow the state to try to economize on long-term
and mental health care without having to go through the usual federal
red tape.
Click
here to read this story and updates at Stateline.org.
Erin Madigan contributed to this report
Send your comments on this story to letters@stateline.org.
Selected reader feedback will be posted in the Letter To Editor
section.
Contact Pamela M. Prah
at pprah@stateline.org.
Sources: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and
the Uninsured; U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; National
Conference of State Legislatures; National Governors Association;
National Association of State Budget Officers; *Based on KCMU Medicaid
Benefits database, as of January 2003.

Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |