SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

 • General Features

 • Find Help

 • SENIOR ALERTS

 • Baby Boomers

 • Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

 • Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

 • Social Security Reform

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 • Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

• Go to more on Health & Medicine or More Senior News on the Front Page

 

Click here to vitamins without a pill.


 
 

E-mail this page to a friend!

Success of Raloxifene to Prevent Breast Cancer is Encouraging for Senior Women

Osteoporosis drug Raloxifene as effective as Tamoxifen without side effects

April 19, 2006 – The study released Monday showing the drug raloxifene, currently used to prevent and treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, works as well as tamoxifen in reducing breast cancer risk, without some of the side effects, is encouraging news for female senior citizens, who are at the highest risk of breast cancer. The disease is expected to strike 213,000 American women this year, with the majority being over 50 years of age. The results show less uterine cancer and blood clots from raloxifene.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Postmenopausal Women See No Increased Risk of Breast Cancer with Estrogen-Alone

April 11, 2006 - Estrogen-alone hormone therapy does not increase the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, according to an updated analysis of the breast cancer findings of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Estrogen-Alone Trial. Read more...

Estrogen May Increase Blood Clots in Postmenopausal Women, Breast Cancer in Blacks

April 11, 2006 - Estrogen therapy may increase the risk of venous thrombosis, the formation of blood clots in the veins, among postmenopausal women who have had their uterus removed, according to a study in the April 10 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. Another study in this issue says hormone therapy, including estrogen, appears to be associated with increased risk of breast cancer among black women. Read more...

Cancer Deaths to Continue Decline in 2006

Annual report from American Cancer Society says death rate has declined since 1991

Feb. 9, 2006 - -The American Cancer Society's annual estimate of cancer deaths says 2006 will see a slight decline in the projected number of cancer deaths compared to estimates made for 2005. The projections are based on a decline in the actual number of cancer deaths reported by the National Center for Health Statistics for 2002 (557,271 deaths) and 2003 (556,902 deaths), the first decline in the actual number of cancer deaths in over 70 years. Read more... with graphs...

Study of Postmenopausal Women

Low-Fat Diet with Fruit, Veggies, Grains Does NOT Reduce Heart, Breast Cancer or Colon Cancer Risks

Study findings send shock waves through health care community

Feb. 6, 2006 – Results of new studies were released today that indicate a diet low in fat, but high in fruit, vegetables and grains, does not significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer, colorectal cancer or cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. These findings that run counter to what has been preached by health experts for years. The three articles will be published in tomorrow's Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), but they have already stirred up a storm of caution. Read more...

Surgery Best for Controlling Breast Cancer in Elderly Women

By Becky Ham, Science Writer
Health Behavior News Service

Jan. 30, 2006 - Although women over age 70 are rarely offered surgery to treat their breast cancer, a new review of recent studies suggests surgery works better than hormone therapy to stop the progression of breast cancer in older women with operable tumors. Read more...

Read more on Health & Medicine

 

These initial results are from the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene, or STAR. In STAR, both drugs reduced the risk of developing invasive breast cancer by about 50 percent.

However, within the study, women who were prospectively and randomly assigned to take raloxifene daily, and who were followed for an average of about four years, had 36 percent fewer uterine cancers and 29 percent fewer blood clots than the women who were assigned to take tamoxifen.

Uterine cancers, especially endometrial cancers, are a rare but serious side effect of tamoxifen. Both tamoxifen and raloxifene are known to increase a woman's risk of blood clots.

STAR, one of the largest breast cancer prevention clinical trials ever conducted, enrolled 19,747 postmenopausal women who were at increased risk of the disease. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 60 mg of raloxifene (Evistaฎ) or 20 mg of tamoxifen (Nolvadexฎ) daily for five years.

The trial is coordinated by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), a network of cancer research professionals, and is sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health.

"This optimistic news from STAR is a significant step in breast cancer prevention," said John E. Niederhuber, M.D., currently providing leadership at NCI. "These results, once again, demonstrate the critical importance of clinical trials in our efforts to establish evidence-based practices."

"In 1998, the landmark Breast Cancer Prevention Trial showed that tamoxifen could reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal women by nearly 50 percent," said Norman Wolmark, M.D., NSABP chairman.

"Today, we can tell you that for postmenopausal women at increased risk of breast cancer, raloxifene is just as effective, without some of the serious side effects known to occur with tamoxifen."

Women taking either drug had equivalent numbers of strokes, heart attacks, and bone fractures. Both raloxifene and tamoxifen are known to protect bone health; it is estimated that half a million postmenopausal women are currently taking raloxifene by prescription to prevent or treat osteoporosis. Additionally, the initial results from STAR suggest that raloxifene does not increase the risk of developing a cataract, as tamoxifen does.

"Although no drugs are without side effects, tamoxifen and raloxifene are vital options for women who are at increased risk of breast cancer and want to take action," said Leslie Ford, M.D., associate director for clinical research in NCI's Division of Cancer Prevention. "For many women, raloxifene's benefits will outweigh its risks in a way that tamoxifen's benefits do not."

The STAR researchers also tracked known menopausal side effects that occur with both drugs and monitored the participants' quality of life. The data show that side effects of both drugs were mild to moderate in severity, and quality of life was the same for both drugs.

Participants in STAR are now receiving information about which drug they were taking. Women assigned to raloxifene will continue to be provided with the drug until they have completed five years of treatment. Those women assigned to tamoxifen can choose to continue taking tamoxifen or to receive raloxifene to complete their five years of treatment.

Study details include:

  STAR enrolled 19,747 women. This data analysis is based on the 19,471 women for whom complete study information was available.

  The numbers of invasive breast cancers in both groups of women were statistically equivalent. Among the 9,745 women in the raloxifene group, 167 developed invasive breast cancer, compared to 163 of 9,726 women in the tamoxifen group.

  More than half of the women who joined STAR had had a hysterectomy and, therefore, were not at risk of uterine cancer. For those women with a uterus, 36 of 4,732 who were assigned to take tamoxifen developed uterine cancers (mainly endometrial cancer) compared to 23 of 4,712 women who were assigned to take raloxifene.

  In STAR, women in the raloxifene group had 29 percent fewer deep vein thromboses (blood clots in a major vein) and pulmonary embolisms (blood clots in the lung) than women in the tamoxifen group. Specifically, 87 of 9,726 women in the tamoxifen group had a deep vein thrombosis compared to 65 of 9,745 women taking raloxifene. In addition, 54 of 9,726 women taking tamoxifen developed pulmonary embolisms compared to 35 of 9,745 women taking raloxifene.

  The number of strokes occurring in both groups of women was statistically equivalent: 53 of 9,726 women in the tamoxifen group and 51 of 9,745 women in the raloxifene group had a stroke during the trial. There was no difference in deaths from strokes: 6 of 9,726 women in the tamoxifen group and 4 of 9,745 women in the raloxifene group died from this event. Women at increased risk of stroke (those with uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes, or a history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or atrial fibrillation) were not eligible to participate in STAR.

  While tamoxifen has been shown to reduce, by half, the incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), raloxifene did not have an effect on these diagnoses. (LCIS and DCIS are sometimes called noninvasive breast cancers.) Of the 9,726 women taking tamoxifen, 57 developed LCIS or DCIS, compared to 81 of 9,745 taking raloxifene. This result confirms data reported in 2004 in a large study of raloxifene, the Continued Outcomes Relevant to Evista (or CORE Trial).

"These results indicate an important and significant breakthrough in our ongoing battle with breast cancer, and serve as an example of the value of clinical trials in breast cancer research and treatment," said Pat Halpin- Murphy, president and founder of the Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition and board member of the NSABP.

"Women and their oncologists will soon have the power to make a decision that could add another option in preventing invasive breast cancer with fewer side effects because of the efforts of the many women who volunteered to participate in this prevention study."

Women who participated in STAR were postmenopausal, at least 35 years old, and had an increased risk of breast cancer as determined by their age, family history of breast cancer, personal medical history, age at first menstrual period, and age at first live birth. Before participating in the study, the women were instructed about the potential risks and benefits of tamoxifen and raloxifene and then were asked to sign an informed consent document.

STAR investigators will present additional data at the 42nd annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) from June 2-6, 2006, in Atlanta, Ga. "This is an important and long awaited trial," said Sandra J. Horning, M.D., president of ASCO, "and we look forward to further discussion and analysis at the ASCO annual meeting that will address the observed differences in toxicity and prevention of non-invasive breast cancers with the two treatment approaches." A manuscript is also being submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

The maker of tamoxifen, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Del., and the maker of raloxifene, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Ind., provided their drugs and matching placebos for the trial without charge to participants. Eli Lilly and Company also gave NSABP support to defray recruitment costs at the participating centers and to help local investigators conduct the study.

For more information:

> For more information about STAR visit NCI's STAR home page at http://www.cancer.gov/star or at NSABP's Web sites at http://www.nsabp.pitt.edu or http://foundation.nsabp.org.

> For a Q&A related to the STAR results, go to: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/STARresultsQandA.

> For tools used to calculate a woman's risk of breast cancer, visit http://cancer.gov/bcrisktool or http://breastcancerprevention.com.

> Visit http://www.breastcancerprevention.org/ to calculate your breast cancer risk.

 

Click here to Search SeniorJournal.com for more on this subject

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

     Back to Top

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, www.DeweySquare.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.

E-mail - editor@SeniorJournal.com