|
E-mail this page to a friend!
Senior Citizen Deaths Higher than Expected from
Obesity Stomach Surgery
Increasing numbers turning to Medicare-paid bariatric
surgery
Oct. 19, 2005 – Senior citizens are increasingly
turning to surgery of the stomach or intestines (bariatic surgery) as a
way to prevent death from obesity. Three studies reported today in the
Journal of the American Medical Association have found death rates
higher than previously estimated, increased hospitalization rates after
the surgery and a substantial increase in the number of these
procedures.
Among Medicare beneficiaries, which includes most
of the seniors, the risk of early death after bariatric surgery is
considerably higher than previously suggested and associated with
advancing age, male sex, and lower surgeon volume of bariatric
procedures. Patients aged 65 years or older had a substantially higher
risk of death within the early postoperative period than younger
patients.
In the United States, most adults are overweight or
obese, and obesity is soon to become the leading cause of death.
Bariatric surgical procedures are the only interventions that
consistently help patients achieve significant and sustained weight loss
and improvements in comorbid medical conditions.
As a result, there has been dramatic growth in
bariatric surgery over the last decade, with interest in applying it to
those at high risk based on associated medical conditions and the
growing population of older, obese patients.
Balanced against these beneficial effects, however,
are the risks of perioperative death and short-term adverse outcomes.
These risks have been poorly defined in the community at large, with the
expected rates largely derived from case series. Several high-profile
reports of death after bariatric surgery have challenged these estimates
and have triggered a critical reappraisal of bariatric surgical safety.
Medicare, the United States’ largest health care
insurer, currently reimburses for bariatric procedures on a regional
basis and is the primary payer for approximately 20% of all procedures
performed in at least 1 state.
However, Medicare policy in this area is at a
crossroads: there is no national coverage decision and no consensus
regarding the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in older
patients.
Following are reports on the three studies.
Risk of Death from Bariatric Surgery among
Medicare Patients Higher Than Previously Estimated
Medicare patients have a substantially higher risk
of early death following bariatric surgery than previously suggested,
and the risk of death is higher among men, older patients, and patients
of surgeons who perform lower numbers of bariatric procedures, according
to a study in the October 19 issue of JAMA.
In the United States, most adults are overweight or
obese, and obesity is soon to become the leading cause of death,
according to background information in the article. Bariatric surgical
procedures (surgery on the stomach and/or intestines designed to promote
weight loss) are the only interventions that consistently help patients
achieve significant and sustained weight loss and improvements with
co-existing medical conditions. As a result, there has been dramatic
growth in bariatric surgery over the last decade. Balanced against these
beneficial effects, however, are the risks of perioperative death and
short-term adverse outcomes, which have been poorly defined in the
community-at-large.
| |
Editorial from JAMA |
|
| |
“These studies contribute
important information regarding morbid obesity and its
treatment,” write Bruce M. Wolfe, M.D., of Oregon Health &
Science University, Portland, and John M. Morton, M.D., M.P.H.,
of Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., in an editorial.
“Morbid obesity is a
significant health concern and bariatric surgery offers a
potentially effective and enduring treatment for weight
reduction. Bariatric surgery results in long-term weight loss,
helps resolve comorbidities, provides a survival benefit, and
has increased substantially as a direct consequence of its
success in treating morbid obesity,” they say.
“These studies demonstrate
that there are vulnerable patient populations and potential
additional costs associated with surgery but suggest that
surgical volume helps mitigate these risks and costs. Bariatric
surgery may be a potentially life-saving intervention in the
right patients and in the right surgeons’ hands. The studies
presented in this issue indicate that experience and technique
count.”
“Given that obesity is a
societal concern, there must be societal solutions and
perspective. Prevention initiatives, medical alternatives, and
new technologies may emerge in the future to help combat
obesity. However, bariatric surgery today remains a fundamental
therapy for morbidly obese patients.”
“The studies by Santry et
al, Zingmond et al, and Flum et al must be seen as opportunities
for improvement in bariatric surgery, not as support for
exclusionary practices by payors for patients in dire need.
Instead, bariatric surgeons must meet the challenge of safely
and efficiently providing this essential therapy for the most
imperiled patients,” the authors write. |
|
David R. Flum, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of
Washington, Seattle, and colleagues conducted a study to determine the
risk of all-cause early postsurgical death among Medicare beneficiaries
undergoing open bariatric surgery. The study examined early (30-day,
90-day, and 1-year) death figures for all U.S. fee-for-service Medicare
beneficiaries who underwent bariatric procedures from 1997-2002.
A total of 16,155 patients underwent bariatric
surgical procedures (average age, 48 years; 75.8 percent women, with
90.6 percent younger than 65 years). A total of 61.2 percent of cases
were claims for the bariatric surgical procedure Roux-en-y
gastroenterostomy (RYGB) and 19.9 percent were for RYGB with small
intestine reconstruction to limit absorption. There was more than a
3-fold increase in the number of procedures performed from 1997
(n=1,464) to 2002 (n=4,814).
The researchers found that among all patients, the
rates of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year death were 2.0 percent, 2.8 percent,
and 4.6 percent, respectively. Advancing age and male sex were
associated with early death after bariatric surgery, with the highest
rates of early death among older men. Overall, men were more likely to
die after bariatric surgery than women (3.7 percent vs. 1.5 percent, 4.8
percent vs. 2.1 percent, and 7.5 percent vs. 3.7 percent for men and
women at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, respectively). Death rates were
greater for those aged 65 years or older (n=1,517) compared with younger
patients (4.8 percent vs. 1.7 percent, 6.9 percent vs. 2.3 percent, and
11.1 percent vs. 3.9 percent at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year,
respectively).
After adjustment for sex and co-existing illness
index, the odds of death within 90 days were 5-fold greater for older
Medicare beneficiaries (aged 75 years or older; n=136) than for those
aged 65 to 74 years (n=1,381). The odds of death at 90 days were 1.6
times higher for patients of surgeons with less than the median surgical
volume of bariatric procedures (among Medicare beneficiaries during the
study period) after adjusting for age, sex, and co-existing illness
index.
“There may be several reasons for these findings.
Older patients do not tolerate surgical stress as well as younger
patients and may also have less benefit after surgery than younger
patients because much of the impact of obesity on organ systems, such as
the heart, may have occurred by the time of the operation. It also
remains to be seen if surgical weight loss in older patients decreases
utilization of health care resources, improves functional status and
quality of life, or extends survival as has been suggested in studies of
younger patients,” the authors write.
“In conclusion, this study found that the risk of
early postsurgical death among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing
bariatric surgery was considerably higher than prior case series have
suggested and was strongly associated with advancing age, male sex, and
lower surgeon volume. Those considering the role of bariatric procedures
in older patients should balance this population-level risk of adverse
outcomes against the anticipated benefits of the procedure. Directing
care of older patients to surgeons who perform higher volume of
bariatric procedures in Medicare beneficiaries might be expected to
improve outcomes in this high-risk population,” the researchers write.
Editor’s Note: This work was funded in part by
grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases.
Bariatric Surgical Procedures Increase
Substantially
The number of bariatric surgical procedures
performed in the U.S. from 1998 to 2003 increased considerably,
according to a study in the October 19 issue of JAMA.
Morbid obesity is an increasing health problem in
the United States, according to background information in the article.
In 2002, 5.1 percent of U.S. adults had a body mass index (BMI) higher
than 40. The prevalence of individuals with a BMI higher than 40
quadrupled from 1:200 in 1986 to 1:50 in 2000; the prevalence of
individuals with a BMI higher than 50 quintupled from 1:2000 to 1:400.
The increasing prevalence and associated sociodemographic disparities of
morbid obesity are serious public health concerns. Bariatric surgical
procedures provide greater and more durable weight reduction than
behavioral and pharmacological interventions for morbid obesity.
Heena P. Santry, M.D., of the University of
Chicago, and colleagues examined recent national population-based trends
in bariatric surgical procedures, patient characteristics, and
in-hospital complications to determine trends in newer techniques, in
sociodemographic disparities, in co-existing illnesses, and in surgical
complications due to these procedural and patient population changes.
The researchers used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify U.S.
bariatric surgery admissions from 1998-2002 (with preliminary data for
12 states for 2003).
The researchers found that the estimated number of
bariatric surgical procedures increased from 13,365 in 1998 to 72,177 in
2002. Based on preliminary state-level data (1998-2003), the number of
bariatric surgical procedures is projected to be 102,794 in 2003.
Gastric bypass procedures accounted for more than 80 percent of all
bariatric surgical procedures. From 1998 to 2002, there were upward
trends in the proportion of females (81 percent to 84 percent),
privately insured patients (75 percent to 83 percent), patients from ZIP
code areas with highest annual household income (32 percent to 60
percent), and patients aged 50 to 64 years (15 percent to 24 percent).
Length of stay decreased from 4.5 days in 1998 to 3.3 days in 2002. The
adjusted in-hospital death rate ranged from 0.1 percent to 0.2 percent.
The rates of unexpected reoperations for surgical complications ranged
from 6 percent to 9 percent and pulmonary complications ranged from 4
percent to 7 percent. Rates of other in-hospital complications were low.
“If our observed rate of growth continues, there
will be approximately 130,000 bariatric procedures in 2005 and as many
as 218,000 in 2010. The cost to the U.S. health care system will be
substantial. However, in the absence of a nonsurgical option for morbid
obesity, our findings regarding in-hospital safety of bariatric surgery
are promising while our findings regarding worsening sociodemographic
disparities are worrisome,” the authors write.
“Disproportionate sociocultural pressures to be
thin may explain the imbalance between men and women undergoing an
elective procedure for weight loss. Type of insurance coverage also may
play a role in socioeconomic disparities,” the researchers write. “Other
sources of disparities include the possibility that cultural attitudes
toward morbid obesity may differ by socioeconomic status, that primary
care physicians may be less likely to refer patients of lower
socioeconomic status for bariatric surgery, or that hospitals providing
bariatric surgery may be less accessible to lower socioeconomic groups.”
The researchers add that public health campaigns
focusing on the health dangers of obesity may help shift thinking about
obesity from a cosmetic concern of women to a health concern for both
sexes.
“With increased knowledge of bariatric surgery
indications, risks, and benefits among health care professionals,
bariatric surgery is likely to become the standard of care for morbidly
obese individuals. Together, these changes should lead to more morbidly
obese patients of both sexes and all socioeconomic groups seeking
surgery. Although preventing obesity should remain the focus of U.S.
health care, efforts must be made to ensure equal access to bariatric
surgery irrespective of sex and socioeconomic status for those who are
morbidly obese, have an indication for surgical intervention, and wish
to undergo an elective surgical procedure to improve health, longevity,
and quality of life,” the authors conclude.
Editor’s Note: Dr. Santry was supported by a
fellowship from the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and a
pilot project grant from the National Institute on Aging to the Center
on Aging at the University of Chicago, and the Dr. Paul Jordan Research
Fund in Surgery at the University of Chicago.
Patients Have Increased Hospitalization Rate
after Gastric Bypass Surgery
Patients who have gastric bypass surgery have
double the rate of hospitalization in the year following the operation
than in the year preceding surgery, according to a study in the October
19 issue of JAMA.
Bariatric surgical procedures are an increasingly
common treatment for morbid obesity, according to background information
in the article. More than 100,000 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (RYGB)—the
primary bariatric procedure now done—are performed annually in the
United States. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of bariatric
procedures determined that the average percentage of excess weight loss
after operation was 61 percent, with rates of resolution or improvement
for the following co-existing illnesses: diabetes 86 percent,
hyperlipidemia 70 percent, hypertension 79 percent, and obstructive
sleep apnea 84 percent. Utilization of inpatient services after RYGB is
not well understood.
David S. Zingmond, M.D., Ph.D., of the University
of California, Los Angeles, and colleagues assessed the impact of RYGB
on use of inpatient care by examining rates of inpatient hospitalization
before and after RYGB performed in California between 1995 and 2004.
In California from 1995-2004, a total of 60,077
California residents underwent RYGB for obesity, with 11,659 in 2004.
The average age was 42.2 years, 84 percent of patients were women, and
88 percent were privately insured or self-pay. Average length of stay
was 3.5 days. For patients with a year of follow-up (1995-2003), 19.3
percent were readmitted within the first year after RYGB surgery
compared with 7.9 percent being admitted in the year before surgery. In
a subset analysis of all patients (24,678) who underwent RYGB with
complete 3-year follow-up, the average percentage of patients admitted
in the year prior to RYGB was 8.4 percent. In each of the 3 years
following RYGB, the rates of hospitalization remained increased, with
20.2 percent of patients readmitted in the first year after RYGB, 18.4
percent in the second year after, and 14.9 percent in the third year
after. The cumulative admission rate for the 3-year period prior to RYGB
was 20.2 percent compared with the cumulative 3-year admission rate
after RYGB of 40.4 percent.
For persons with 3 years of follow-up, average
hospital charges were $33,672 for RYGB, $4,970 for hospitalizations in
the 3 years before RYGB, and $20,651 for hospitalizations in the 3 years
after RYGB. In the subset of patients with full 5 years of follow-up
(1995-1999), postoperative admission rates remained elevated (average
13.3 percent) in the fifth year after operation.
The most common reasons for admission prior to RYGB
were obesity related problems (e.g., osteoarthritis, lower extremity
cellulitis), and elective operation (e.g., hysterectomy), while the most
common reasons for admission after RYGB were complications often thought
to be procedure related, such as ventral hernia repair and gastric
revision.
“A working hypothesis in our study was that use of
health care services should likewise improve, namely that inpatient care
should decrease after RYGB. However, we found significant and sustained
increases in the rates of hospital admission for morbidly obese patients
after RYGB. Annual rates of hospital admission after RYGB are double
than prior to operation and are sustained beyond a year in this
population-based study,” the authors write.
“Our findings may have implications for payers and
purchasers of health care. Rather than expecting a decrease in inpatient
health care utilization after RYGB, the costs associated with inpatient
hospitalization may remain elevated for as many as 5 years following
RYGB. Analysis of 3-year charges before and after RYGB suggest that
costs of post-RYGB–related procedures and complications may be 40
percent to 60 percent of the costs of RYGB itself.”
“The potential of RYGB for yielding long-term
weight reduction and alleviation of obesity-related comorbid illnesses
has significantly increased the rates of RYGB over the past decade.
Despite these potential benefits, the current study demonstrates that
the rates of hospitalization doubles in the years after operation and
that many of these admissions are directly attributable to this
procedure,” the researchers conclude.
Editor’s Note: Dr. Zingmond is funded by a Mentored
Clinical Scientist Award from the National Institute on Aging. Co-author
Dr. McGory is funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars
Program at the University of California Los Angeles.
Click to More Senior News on the
Front Page
Copyright: SeniorJournal.com |