SENIOR JOURNAL.COM - Senior Citizens Information and News

Front Page    Search     Contact Us     Advertise in Senior Journal


SeniorJournal.com

INDEX


FRONT PAGE

PAGE TWO
More Headlines

  General Features

  Find Help

  SENIOR ALERTS

  Baby Boomers

  Odds & Ends

Health-Fitness

  Aging

 • Alzheimer's & Dementia

 • Fitness

 • Health/Medicine

 • Medical Research

 • Nutrition/Vitamin

Government

 • Politics

 • Medicare

 • Medicare Drug Program

 • Medicare Q&A - Dear Marci

 • Medicaid

 • Social Security

 • Social Security, Medicare Q&A

Enjoying Life

 • Books

 • Entertainment

 • Features

 • Grandparents

 • Senior Statistics

 • Senior Stars

 • Sex & Seniors

 • Sports

 • Travel

 • Senior Volunteers

On The Web

 • Links - Senior

 • Senior Friendly Business Links

 • Sites We Like

Elderly Issues

 • Elder Care

 • Assistance for Elderly

 • Housing

Money 

 • Discounts

 Guarding Your Wealth for Seniors

 • Money Matters

 • Reverse Mortgage

 • Retirement

Thinking

 • Opinions



Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens & Baby Boomers

More Senior Citizen News and Information Than Any Other Source - SeniorJournal.com

Get Instant Supplemental Medicare Insurance Quotes.

• Go to more on Health & Medicine or More Senior News from SeniorJournal.com on the Front Page

Find the Best Medicare Advantage Plans for Seniors

   

E-mail this page to a friend!

Health & Medicine for Senior Citizen

Colon Cancer Testing Should Continue Consistently Through Age 75, Task Force Says

U.S. Preventative Services Task Force issues new guidelines on how, when to test for colorectal cancer

Oct. 7, 2008 - New findings from a Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) suggest that routine colorectal cancer screenings can be stopped in patients over the age of 75. The results are based on patients who began screenings at age 50 and have had consistently negative screenings up to the age of 75 resulting from annual screening with sensitive Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT), ten yearly colonoscopies, or five yearly sigmoidoscopies with a mid-interval sensitive FOBT.

 

Related Stories

 
 

Virtual Colonoscopy Ready for Prime Time as Less Worrisome Way to Find Colon Cancer

Large trial says CT Colonography comparable to colonoscopy in helping prevent third most diagnosed cancer, second leading cause of cancer death

Sept. 22, 2008


Study Confirms Older Americans Need to Have Colonoscopy at Age 50

Cancer's precursor polyps, known as adenoma, sharply increase after age 50

Below story see...

Medicare's coverage of tests for colorectal cancer.

More about colon cancer.

Sept. 3, 2008 – People over age 50, who are still wrestling with the decision of whether they should have a colonoscopy, received another wake-up call this week from a study detailing the rapid increase of polyps – the precursor of virtually all colorectal cancers – that begin to occur at that age. Read more...


CDC Researcher Suggests Lack of Insurance is Reason for Lack of Colorectal Cancer Screening

Rates of those tested jumped after 2001 when Medicare expanded coverage for colonoscopy

July 14, 2008


Colon Cancer Usually Preventable if Older People Just Step Up to Screening

Researchers working to make screening less invasive, more accurate

By Nicole Fawcett

March 28, 2008


Colorectal Cancer Screening to at Least Age 84 Appears Essential for Elderly

Obesity greater colorectal cancer risk factor for women than smoking; this cancer differs in minorities

Oct. 15, 2007


Xeloda Tablet Improves Survival Rate from Colon Cancer Versus Chemo

Oral medicine approved in U.S. to also treat metastatic breast cancer

Oct. 8, 2007 –  Read more...


Experts Debunk Fears, Misconceptions about Colon Cancer and Screening

12 myths about No. 1 cause of cancer death among non-smokers

Feb. 26, 2007


Senior Citizens Taking NSAIDS Like Aspirin Reduce Risk of Colorectal Cancer

Safer drugs needed before therapy can be recommended, researchers say

July 24, 2007


Read the latest news on Senior Health & Medicine

 

In July 2002, the last recommendation by the USPSTF concluded that there was enough evidence to recommend strongly that all average risk adults 50 years of age and older be offered colorectal cancer screening.

However, the logistics of screening such as type of screening test, screening intervals, and age to stop screening were not evaluated in terms of the balance of benefits and potential harms.

In updating its recommendations for 2008, the USPSTF requested a decision analysis to project expected outcomes of various colorectal cancer screening strategies to inform its update of the recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.

 “Screening for colorectal cancer saves lives,” said Task Force Chair Ned Calonge, M.D., who is also chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 

“Current rates for colorectal cancer screening are much lower than other types of cancer screening.  We hope patients and physicians will discuss the potential benefits and harms and choose an appropriate screening method for them.”

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. 

The findings are published in the October 7, 2008 online edition of Annals of Internal Medicine, along with the summary of evidence, and will appear in the Nov. 4 print edition of the journal.

"To date there has been no age to stop colorectal cancer screening,” says Ann Graham Zauber, PhD, Associate Attending Biostatistician in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and lead author of the study evaluating testing methods.

“Our results suggest that there is little gain in life expectancy in continuing colorectal cancer screening after age 75, for those who have had repeated negative screening examinations since the age of 50.”

“People who have had adenomas or colorectal cancer should continue surveillance after age 75," said Dr. Zauber, who added that "our findings also suggest that the more sensitive fecal occult blood tests can provide comparable life years saved to screening colonoscopy provided high adherence to these screening tests."

"Our objective was to assess life years gained and colonoscopy requirements for colorectal cancer screening strategies and identify a set of recommendable screening strategies," she said.

The Task Force recommends against routine colorectal cancer screening in adults between the ages of 76 and 85, because the benefits of regular screening were small compared with the risks.  The Task Force also recommends that adults over the age of 85 not be screened at all because the harms of screening may be significant, and other conditions may be more likely to affect their health or well-being.

For people of all ages, the Task Force found insufficient evidence to assess the benefits and harms of computed tomographic (CT) colonography and fecal DNA testing as screening methods for the disease. 

Further, these Task Force recommendations don’t apply to people with a personal history of certain types of polyps who are being monitored regularly for the condition or to those who have a family history of rare syndromes that increase a person’s chances of getting colon cancer. 

“Although colonoscopy is considered to be the standard against which other screening tests are compared, the test is not perfect and may in fact miss some polyps and colorectal cancer,” according to a news release from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 

“Because colonoscopy is an invasive procedure, it has greater risk of complications than any other screening methods. 

“Sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood testing are less invasive and have a lower risk of harms.  However, patients who receive positive test results for detection of polyps will require a follow-up colonoscopy regardless of the screening test used. 

“Because the risks and benefits of all tests vary, patients and clinicians are encouraged to decide together which test is appropriate.” 

The Task Force is the leading independent panel of experts in prevention and primary care.  The Task Force, which is supported by AHRQ, conducts rigorous, impartial assessments of the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of a broad range of clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling and preventive medications. 

Its recommendations are considered the gold standard for clinical preventive services. 

The Task Force based its conclusions on a report from a research team led by Evelyn Whitlock, M.D., at the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, which is part of AHRQ’s Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center.

The recommendations and materials for clinicians are available on the AHRQ Web site at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspscolo.htm.  

This is the first time that the USPSTF has incorporated a decision analysis to inform its recommendations. Previously the Task Force has used an extensive structured literature review.

This time, the USPSTF has both the evidence review of published work and this decision analysis, which considered 145 different strategies (90 single-test strategies, 54 combination-test strategies, and one no screening-strategy) on age to begin, age to stop, and intervals of testing for guaiac FOBT (lower and higher sensitivity test), fecal immunochemical test, and flexible sigmoidoscopy alone and with a sensitive FOBT.

Dr. Zauber and colleagues translated the best evidence from randomized trials into structured and comparable outcomes of life years saved relative to use of colonoscopy resources. This work represents the transition from evidence-based to evidence-informed recommendations.

"This excellent decision analysis by Dr. Zauber and colleagues confirms the validity of colorectal cancer screening in men and women ages 50 to 75, which will provide the greatest benefit with saving of resources,” added Dr. Sidney Winawer, the Paul Sherlock Chair in Medicine in the Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.  

“Unfortunately the majority of Americans in this age range do not get screened at all, resulting in tragic consequences for them and their families. There is no reason why 50,000 people should die of this disease in America each year,"

This research is joint work of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with Erasmus MC of Rotterdam, the Netherlands, the University of Minnesota, and Massachusetts General Hospital as part of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) of NCI and is an example of comparative modeling with independently developed microsimulation models.

This study was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute and the Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality.

Previous Task Force recommendations, summaries of the evidence and related materials are available from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse by calling (800) 358-9295 or sending an e-mail to ahrqpubs@ahrq.hhs.gov.  Clinical information is also available from AHRQ’s National Guideline Clearinghouse at http://www.guideline.gov.

Search for more about this topic on SeniorJournal.com

Google Web SeniorJournal.com

Keep up with the latest news for senior citizens, baby boomers

 

Click to More Senior News on the Front Page

Copyright: SeniorJournal.com

    

 

Published by New Tech Media - www.NewTechMedia.com

Other New Tech Media sites include CaroleSutherland.com, BethJanicek.com, SASeniors.com, DrugDanger.com, etc.