|
Grandparents Lose Another
Visitation Case; This One - Actually Two - in Illinois Supreme
Court
|
For the Complete Opinion
Written by Justice Thomas R. Fitzgerald -
Click Here |
|

Justice Fitzgerald and his wife, Gayle,
have been married for 32 years. They have five children and two
grandchildren. |
April 19, 2002 -
The ruling yesterday by the Illinois Supreme Court overturned two
trial court decisions in which grandparents earlier successfully sued
single, surviving parents for more visits with a grandchild. Some say
the Illinois "grandparents visitation" law was totally struck down,
while others say only parts of it were eliminated.
Clearly, the court
ruled that parents have full authority to raise their children unless
their health or safety is in danger.
The ruling in the two
cases involved parents whose spouses had died and the parents did not
deny grandparents visitation but insisted that the children not spend
the night at the grandparents' homes. In one case, the surviving
father would drive his daughter to visit her grandmother, who lived 50
minutes away, and in the other the grandparents baby-sat their two
grandchildren one night a week at the children's home, according to a
report by UPI.
One case involved
Paul Michael Byrne, a widower whose former mother-in-law won a lawsuit
for longer, unsupervised time with his daughter.
In 2000, the state
Supreme Court ruled that the law -- which gave grandparents the right
to sue -- was unconstitutional when both parents were alive to decide
whether to let children visit. But the court left open the question of
what was allowed when one parent was dead and the other wanted to
limit visits.
The court said it
recognized the benefits of the "intergenerational relationship"
between children and their grandparents. But in cases where a parent
is deemed constitutionally fit, it is in the children's best interests
that "parents, not judges, should be the ones to decide with whom
their children will and will not associate."
The sections of the
law overturned by the court put parents on equal footing with the
petitioning party and narrowly defined who can petition for
visitation. |