One-Third
Of
Nursing
Homes
On
“Watch
List”
Update
Remain
On
List
Because
Of
Previous
Or
New
Violations
Cited
In
State
Inspection
Surveys
—
California
and
Iowa
Have
Largest
Percentage
of
“Repeat”
Facilities;
Update
and
Shopping
Advice
Posted
in
Free
Area
at
ConsumerReports.org
—
Click
Here
to
State
List
www.consumerreports.org
then
click
on
Nursing
Home
Survey
and
then
on
Nursing
Home
Watch
List
by
State
Yonkers,
New
York,
October
31,
2001—
Consumer
Reports
updated
its
State-by-State
Nursing
Home
“Watch
List”
and
found
that
one-third
of
1,708
homes
remain
on
this
List
because
of
previous
or
new
violations
cited
in
state
inspection
surveys.
Consumer
Reports
believes
that
these
536
“repeat”
facilities
nationwide
may
not
be
correcting
violations,
some
quite
serious,
identified
in
state
inspection
surveys.
In
some
cases,
these
“repeat”
facilities
may
have
corrected
the
specific
violations
that
placed
them
on
the
first
Watch
List,
which
was
released
by
Consumer
Reports
earlier
this
year.
Subsequently,
they
may
have
been
cited
for
new
violations
the
second
time
around.
According
to
an
analysis
of
the
data
used
for
the
Watch
List,
from
the
Centers
for
Medicare
and
Medicaid
Services,
the
federal
agency
responsible
for
administering
Medicare
payments
to
nursing
facilities,
the
five
most
common
deficiencies
cited
by
state
inspectors
are:
1.
Storing,
preparing,
and
serving
food
under
unsanitary
conditions.
2.
Quality
of
care
—
for
example,
failure
to
give
adequate
fluids
to
someone
who
is
dying.
3.
Failure
to
keep
the
facility
free
from
hazards
that
cause
accidents.
4.
Fostering
conditions
that
cause
pressure
sores.
5.
Failure
to
prepare
comprehensive
care
plans.
This
is
a
serious
violation.
Without
this
plan,
there
is
little
guidance
for
the
staff
on
how
to
care
for
a
resident.
This
information
is
particularly
relevant
now
because
in
September
the
U.S.
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services
had
considered
reducing
government
regulation
of
nursing
homes
as
a
cost-cutting
measure.
Watch
List
findings
suggest
that
reducing
regulations
would
further
endanger
one
of
the
nation’s
most
vulnerable
populations.
“Our
study
shows
that
too
many
nursing
homes
are
failing
to
keep
their
residents
safe,”
Trudy
Lieberman
says.
“These
facilities
make
it
difficult
for
residents
to
reach
the
highest
level
they
can
function
at.
This
certainly
indicates
that
any
move
to
cut
the
number
of
inspections
at
the
nation’s
nursing
homes
would
be
a
serious
mistake.”
The
Watch
List
identifies
facilities
by
name,
address,
city
and
state.
It
is
based
on
five
criteria
selected
by
the
Center
for
Consumer
Health
Choices:
-
High-severity
deficiencies:
This
indicates
that
nursing
home
residents
may
be
in
immediate
jeopardy.
-
Substandard
quality-of-care
deficiencies:
Such
deficiencies
could
potentially
affect
resident
safety.
-
High
numbers
of
repeat
deficiencies:
May
indicate
failure
to
address
problems
identified
by
state
inspectors.
-
High
numbers
of
total
deficiencies:
Indicates
potential
failure
to
correct
deficiencies.
-
Citations
for
failing
to
provide
adequate
access
to
the
survey
report:
Many
nursing
homes
hide
their
surveys
if
they
contain
information
they
don’t
want
the
public
to
see.
Consumers
shopping
for
a
nursing
home
should
talk
to
the
local
ombudsman,
who
can
be
located
by
calling
the
Eldercare
Locator
at
1-800-677-1116,
and
by
contacting
local
watchdog
groups.
Research
for
the
Watch
List
was
underwritten
with
funding
provided
by
The
Commonwealth
Fund,
a
New
York-based
philanthropic
organization
interested
in
health
care.
|